Can a Water Analogy for Capacitors Explain the Role of Dielectrics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter i.mehrzad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analogy Capacitor
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the water analogy for capacitors, particularly how introducing a dielectric affects capacitance. It suggests that a dielectric with a dielectric constant k can be likened to replacing a thicker rubber plate with a thinner one, which increases capacity. While the analogy is helpful, some participants note that the original article's explanations are not entirely accurate compared to textbook definitions. The conversation also touches on the concept of net charge, clarifying that while capacitors maintain no net charge change, each plate does experience a net charge gain. This highlights the complexity of understanding capacitors and dielectrics through analogies.
i.mehrzad
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
I have read this site by William J Beaty http://amasci.com/emotor/cap1.html
It lucidly explains the functioning of the capacitor with a water analogy.
I have a question with respect to this.
If in a capacitor we introduce a dielectric with dielectric constant k then can a parellel be drawn with respect to this analogy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. You could say that in the analogy, the rigidity of the rubber plate accounts for the capacity: a thicker plate (more rigid) means less capacity and a thinner more capacity. The introducing a dielectric is the same as changing thick rubber plate for a thinner one.
 
Capacitance

That article is a little iffy. It's not wrong, but neither is the textbook definition. Of course capacitors have no net charge change. This can be seen simply from the sign convention that one plate has charge +Q and the other has charge -Q.

However, each plate does experience a net charge gain, which can be seen simply by separating a charged capacitor and using a single plate to induce a current flowing to a ground.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top