Can acceleration be called directly propotional to inclined plain

AI Thread Summary
Acceleration of an object on an inclined plane is indeed proportional to the slope of that plane. Specifically, the acceleration is determined by the angle of inclination, with the relationship defined by the sine of that angle. For a frictionless inclined plane, as the angle increases from horizontal to vertical, the acceleration varies from zero to gravitational acceleration (g). For example, at a 45-degree incline, the acceleration is approximately 0.7g. Factors such as friction and air resistance can complicate this relationship, but the basic principle holds true.
maryum2001
hi guys and girls i ma new here and need ur help
my question goes that
can acceleration be called directly propotional to inclined plain
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
An inclined plane is an object, not a quantity. I fail to see how anything can be "proportional" to an inclined plane any more than something could be "proportional" to an apple.

Do you mean something like "is the magnitude of the acceleration of an object on an inclined plane proportional to the slope of that plane?"

- Warren
 
Originally posted by chroot
Do you mean something like "is the magnitude of the acceleration of an object on an inclined plane proportional to the slope of that plane?"
That would be my guess. Simple answer: yes. More complicated answer: depends on if you are sliding/rolling, friction (viscous?), air resistance, etc.
 
The acceleration of a block making frictionless contact with an inclined plane is proportional to the sine of the angle of inclination. For instance, for no incline, the acceleration is zero. For maximum incline (straight up and down), the acceleration is g. For a 45deg incline, the acceleration is ~0.7g.
 
thnx guys u r right chroot i meant this "is the magnitude of the acceleration of an object on an inclined plane proportional to the slope of that plane?"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------sorry couldn't interpret it properly
 
Welcome maryum2001!
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top