Can Adding a Lens to a Small Solar Dish Increase Its Heat Output?

AI Thread Summary
Adding a lens to a small solar dish will not increase its overall heat output, as the dish already collects all available energy. Instead, it can change the temperature distribution of the focused energy, potentially leading to higher surface temperatures but also increased re-radiation losses. Using a larger target area can be more effective for heat retention. Water is recommended as a thermal storage medium due to its high specific heat capacity, while combining it with stones may not significantly enhance heat storage. Focusing sunlight effectively can improve performance, particularly in low sunlight conditions, but the cost of advanced systems can be prohibitive.
BurnIt0017
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Increase reflector output?

Greetings, I have been workings on a Solar Tracker. I have some small TV sat dishes that I am planning to cover with Mylar to create the reflector. After viewing some videos on YouTube I noticed that a larger dish produces more heat. Would adding a lens increase output of a smaller dish?
 

Attachments

  • reflector.jpg
    reflector.jpg
    43.2 KB · Views: 493
Science news on Phys.org


BurnIt0017 said:
Greetings, I have been workings on a Solar Tracker. I have some small TV sat dishes that I am planning to cover with Mylar to create the reflector. After viewing some videos on YouTube I noticed that a larger dish produces more heat. Would adding a lens increase output of a smaller dish?

Alas, no. Your dish already collects any energy that's available. You can focus it on a large or small target (depending on what you want) but all you will achieve is a different surface temperature, depending on how small your 'spot' is. There is something to be said for using a large spot because a small spot at high temperature is more likely to re-radiate some of the energy you have received.

I once used a 0.5m diameter microwave dish and coated it with cooking foil. It would boil small quantities of water, in a black metal can, very quickly. The effective power would have been a couple of hundred Watts, I guess, in full sunlight. The 'optical' quality wasn't too good but, as the target was several cm across, it didn't matter.

The optics of combining a number of small dishes would be hard because their focus is too close to each dish to get all the spots to converge. The overall received power would be the sum of all the dish powers. Do you actually need it all focused on one spot?
 


Greetings, my goal is to make one simple working unit using one small dish and if that works then make more. So if use this configuration all I am doing is changing the location of the focal point. I have seen thermal storage unit that just use liquid like water, could you store more heat if a combination of liquid and stones where used in the thermal mass? Thanks for the heads up and best regards.
 

Attachments

  • AZRUNESUNTRACKER.jpg
    AZRUNESUNTRACKER.jpg
    40 KB · Views: 437
  • RegSizeMCcircuit.jpg
    RegSizeMCcircuit.jpg
    61.2 KB · Views: 456


Water is an ideal thermal storage medium as it has the highest specific heat capacity of all common materials and your maximum temperature will not need to be very high (which is where rocks can be an advantage, in electric night storage heaters for instance).

Your idea of focusing the sunlight is a good one, particularly where the Sun is 'feeble'. Some of the up-market panels use cylinders with clear fronts and reflective backs, focussing the sunlight onto narrow tubes along the axis. They give hot water (albeit small quantities) in almost any daylight conditions because of this focussing advantage and resulting high temperature.
They do not use fancy tracking - they just use a larger area than strictly necessary to cope with the pointing losses.
I fancied using them until I saw the PRICES!:eek:
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top