Can an antenna work as a lamp?

AI Thread Summary
An antenna can theoretically emit light since both light and radio waves are electromagnetic (EM) waves, but practical implementation poses challenges due to the small wavelength of light. For instance, a full-wave antenna for red light at 694nm would be too small to be visible, complicating design and functionality. The concept suggests creating an array of metallic light-emitting antennas similar to computer chips, but efficiency compared to LEDs remains uncertain. Additionally, the discussion raises the question of whether lasers are more efficient than LEDs in converting electricity to light. Overall, while the idea is intriguing, significant engineering challenges and efficiency comparisons need to be addressed.
saltine
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
If Light is EM wave, and antenna can emit EM wave, then can an antenna emit light? Is this a matter of designing the antenna correctly or is there something fundamentally wrong about this reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The wavelength of light is so small that an efficient light antenna would be too tiny to see - which sort of defeats the purpose.
 
Interpretation:

Suppose for emitting red light 694nm, the full-wave antenna would be 694nm. So you would fabricate an array of antenna like how computer chips are made from waffers, except it is metallic. On a waffer there would be many of these light-emitting-antennas. Suppose you do something like this, is there a way to tell whether it would be more effcient than LED or less efficient?

Is laser more efficient than LED in converting electricity to light?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top