Can an Astronaut Survive by Throwing a Toolkit in Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ppl k1ll3r
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the physics of an astronaut attempting to return to a space shuttle after being disconnected and having limited air supply. The astronaut throws a 10-kg toolkit at 8 m/s to propel herself back, leading to a calculation of her resulting velocity using momentum conservation principles. It is clarified that the toolkit and the astronaut move in opposite directions, which is essential for momentum conservation. The calculations confirm that the astronaut can indeed survive, as she has enough time to reach the shuttle before running out of air. The discussion emphasizes understanding vector directions and momentum conservation in this scenario.
ppl k1ll3r
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have been hired to check the technical correctness of an upcoming made-for-TV murder mystery. The mystery takes place in a space shuttle. In one scene, the astronaut's safety line is sabotaged while she is on a space walk, so she is no longer connected to the space shuttle. She checks and finds that her thruster pack has also been damaged and no longer works. She is 200 meters from the shuttle and moving with it. The is, she is not moving with respect to the shuttle. There she is drifting in space with only 4 minutes of air remaining. To get back to the shuttle, she decides to unstrap her 10-kg tool kit and throw it away with all her strength, so that it has a speed of 8 m/s. In the script, she survives, but is this correct? Her mass, including the space suit, is 80 kg. (Yes she does survive)

Homework Equations


p = mv
v = d/t
p = p'

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt:

p = p', initial momentum 0 with respect to space shuttle
0 = m2Vfinal + (mkit)(Vkit)
0 = (70)Vfinal + (10)(8)
Vfinal = -1.14 m/s

V = 1.14 m/s
d = 200m

t = d/t
= 175 s

Time she has = 4 min
= 240 s

Therefore, she does survive.

I'm pretty sure I did it wrong though. Because the negative velocity doesn't make sense. Both the kit and her move in the same direction. Any1 wana help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Negative velocities are acceptable. Remember, a velocity is a vector so it can be positive or negative. In this case, it just means your moving in the opposite direction (assuming you picked the toolbelt to travel in the positive direction). Of course if you're adding 2 numbers together to get 0 and the mass is always positive, one definitely needs to be negative. The problem looks correct.

Also, the kit and her do NOT move in the same direction. If that were the case, momentum would not be conserved.
 
Pengwuino said:
Negative velocities are acceptable. Remember, a velocity is a vector so it can be positive or negative. In this case, it just means your moving in the opposite direction (assuming you picked the toolbelt to travel in the positive direction). Of course if you're adding 2 numbers together to get 0 and the mass is always positive, one definitely needs to be negative. The problem looks correct.

Also, the kit and her do NOT move in the same direction. If that were the case, momentum would not be conserved.

But say everything is stationary, then she throws the kit, doesn't that cause her to move in the same direction as the throwing movement pulls her forward? I can't really visualize this.
Also, can you expand on why those 2 things moving in same direction would not result in the conservation of momentum? I really need to understand this topic. This is going to be an easy problem compared to the questions our grade 12 teacher puts on the test.
 
ppl k1ll3r said:
But say everything is stationary, then she throws the kit, doesn't that cause her to move in the same direction as the throwing movement pulls her forward? I can't really visualize this.
Also, can you expand on why those 2 things moving in same direction would not result in the conservation of momentum? I really need to understand this topic. This is going to be an easy problem compared to the questions our grade 12 teacher puts on the test.

Ok so everything is stationary, that is the total momentum is 0. Setup your coordinate system with the astronaut at the origin on the x-axis and the direction they want to throw it, let's say the left, along the negative x-axis. When she throws the kit to the left, the kit has momentum p = mv. v here is -8m/s because its going in the negative x-direction. Her momentum would be p = mv = (-8m/s) * (10kg). Now for momentum to be conserved, the total momentum after her throwing it has to equal 0 since that was the momentum before she threw it. In order to make up for this -80 kg*m/s momentum, she needs to have a positive 80 kg*m/s momentum so that they sum to 0 thus conserving momentum. Since her mass is always positive and in this case, 80kg, the velocity must be positive as well.

The way you setup your program is that the direction away from her was positive and the direction towards the shuttle was negative. In my example, the directions were switched (ie she went a positive velocity and the kit went with a negative velocity) but the idea is the same.
 
Thanks, makes sense now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top