Can an Object Maintain Constant KE and Experience Net Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icanletyougo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
An object can experience net acceleration while maintaining constant kinetic energy through circular motion, where the direction of velocity changes but its magnitude remains constant. The kinetic energy equation, KE = (0.5)mv^2, indicates that if speed (v) does not change, kinetic energy (KE) also remains constant. In circular motion, centripetal acceleration is present, which alters the direction of the velocity vector without increasing its speed. Thus, while the object accelerates towards the center of the circle, its kinetic energy stays the same. This demonstrates that constant acceleration can occur without a change in kinetic energy.
icanletyougo
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Is it possible for an object to experience a net acceleration, yet maintain a constant kinetic
energy?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think no because the kinetic energy equation is KE = (0.5)mv^2, because KE is not change, so v will not change; therefore, it will have acceleration equal =0.
But I'm not sure.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What type of motion has a constant acceleration yet never goes any faster?

Hint: Think of something other than straight-line motion.
 
gneill said:
What type of motion has a constant acceleration yet never goes any faster?

Hint: Think of something other than straight-line motion.

circular motion?
 
icanletyougo said:
circular motion?

Okay. What's your argument as to why this is so?
 
gneill said:
What type of motion has a constant acceleration yet never goes any faster?

Will you consider centripetal acceleration constant. It keeps changing directions.
 
ashishsinghal said:
Will you consider centripetal acceleration constant. It keeps changing directions.

True, but it's a constant magnitude and the kinetic energy does not change.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Momentum and force multiple choice
Replies
1
Views
1K
Why can we move the spring with constant speed when we apply a force?
Replies
29
Views
2K
Kinetic energy as seen from a different frame
Replies
16
Views
2K
Change in Potential energy equals change in Kinetic energy?
Replies
5
Views
8K
Net work and kinetic energy (pushing a wagon to accelerate it)
Replies
1
Views
1K
Conundrums on energy and graphs
Replies
5
Views
1K
Kinetic energy and momentum of two satellites colliding
Replies
8
Views
3K
Is there work for object moving at a constant speed?
Replies
6
Views
5K
Linear Momentum and Acceleration
Replies
2
Views
952
Object is accelerated from rest , find KE
Replies
12
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top