Can an Onto Function Exist for Every Subset of a Given Set?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Proof
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Given any set A, there does not exist a function f:A→P(A)
It wants us to do a proof by contradiction and assume there is an onto function.
For each element a \in A f(a) is a particular subset
of A. The assumption that f is onto means that every subset of A appears as f(a)
for some a \in A To arrive at a contradiction, we will produce
a subset B \subseteq A that is not equal to f(a) for
any a \in A
B=\{a\in A:a\notin f(a)\}
If f is onto then it must be the case that B=f(a') for some a' in A.
the contradiction arises when we consider if a' is an element of B.
First show that the case that a' is in B leads to a contradiction.
Now finish the argument by showing that the case a' is not in B
is equally unacceptable.

The Attempt at a Solution


If a' is in B then a' is in A
and if f is onto then f(a') is in B
if f(a') is in B then f(a') is some a
in A but this is a contradiction
because we assumed that a was not in f(a).
If a' is not in B then it is not in A and therefore
it is not in anything.
Am I headed the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
cragar said:

The Attempt at a Solution


If a' is in B then a' is in A
and if f is onto then f(a') is in B
if f(a') is in B then f(a') is some a
in A but this is a contradiction
because we assumed that a was not in f(a).
If a' is not in B then it is not in A and therefore
it is not in anything.

This is somewhat confused.

Given f, B consists of exactly those elements a \in A which are not members of their image, f(a) \subset A. However there could be other elements of A which are members of their image.

The point is that if f is onto, then by definition B \subset A must be the image of some a' \in A, so that f(a') = B. Note that, by assumption, a' \in A. Whether a' \in B is another question.

So what happens if a' \in B? That would mean that a' is not a member of its image. But its image is B. This is a contradiction.

Now you need to show that a similar contradiction arises if you assume a' \notin B.
 
is image f(a)=a
 
cragar said:
If a' is in B then a' is in A
a' was chosen to be in A.
and if f is onto then f(a') is in B
a' was chosen such that f(a')=B. It cannot be "in B".
is image f(a)=a
a is an element of A; f(a) is a subset of A. They cannot be equal.
Start again at "If a' is in B then " and use the definition of B to deduce something about a'.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top