Can Angular Momentum Equations Be Adapted from Linear Momentum Formulas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lefnire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum equations can be adapted from linear momentum formulas by substituting moment of inertia (I) for mass (m) and angular velocity (ω) for linear velocity (v). The final angular velocity equation derived from the conservation of linear momentum is ω1,f = (COR+1)I2ω2 - ω1(I1-COR*I2) / (I1+I2). However, caution is advised as the coefficient of restitution (COR) for linear motion differs from that of rotational motion. The adaptation's validity hinges on the precise definition of COR in each context. Therefore, while the substitution is feasible, the nuances of COR must be carefully considered.
lefnire
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
using the conservation of linear momentum with a known coefficient of restitution (COR), one can obtain the final velocity of object 1 with this eq'n:
Code:
V1,f= [U](COR+1)M2V2-V1(M1-COR*M2)[/U]
               M1+M2

conservation of linear momentum looks like 'mv', where conservation of angular momentum looks like 'Iω'. Based on this, can I sub in 'I' for every 'm' and 'ω' for every 'v' in the previous equation, such that

Code:
ω1,f= [U](COR+1)I2ω2-ω1(I1-COR*I2)[/U]
               I1+I2

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lefnire said:
using the conservation of linear momentum with a known coefficient of restitution (COR), one can obtain the final velocity of object 1 with this eq'n:
Code:
V1,f= [U](COR+1)M2V2-V1(M1-COR*M2)[/U]
               M1+M2

conservation of linear momentum looks like 'mv', where conservation of angular momentum looks like 'Iω'. Based on this, can I sub in 'I' for every 'm' and 'ω' for every 'v' in the previous equation, such that

Code:
ω1,f= [U](COR+1)I2ω2-ω1(I1-COR*I2)[/U]
               I1+I2

?

I will go so far as to answer this question with a "yes," but have some care.

It all depends on how you define the COR. Obviously, the COR associated with the linear problem will not be the same as the COR associated with the rotational problem...

-Dan
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top