Can any celestal body or anything rotate at speed of 90 degree

kushan
Messages
256
Reaction score
0
can any celestal body or anything rotate at speed of 90 degree per second with a radius of
of more than or equal to 3 X 10 ^ 8 metre ?
is it possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
faster than speed of light ?

ok guys
suppose a body or something with radius of more than or equal to 3X10^8 meters is rotating at speed of 90 degree /sec : then a point at crust of top layer will travel at speed of 3√3 X10^8 m/s (using pythagoras theoram ) so have i done anything wrong please correct me ?
thank you
 

Attachments

  • dee.JPG
    dee.JPG
    7.2 KB · Views: 451


Arithmetic may be correct, but it would be physically impossible.
 


(moderator note -- two threads combined)
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top