Can Any Linear Operator Be Decomposed into Hermitian Components?

dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that any linear operator \hat{O} can be decomposed as \hat{O}=\hat{O}'+i\hat{O}'', where \hat{O}' and \hat{O}'' are Hermitian operators.

Homework Equations



Operator is Hermitian if:

T=T^{\dagger}

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to start :\ Should I try to see for some arbitrary vector |\psi\rangle, that I can write it in some basis, and see what it would do to write eigenvalue equation with those operators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Play with \hat{O}^\dagger+\hat{O} and i(\hat{O}^\dagger-\hat{O}).
 
Hmmm.

So \hat{O}^{\dagger}+\hat{O}=\hat{O}'^{\dagger}-i\hat{O}''^{\dagger}+\hat{O}'+i\hat{O}'' and since those with ' and '' are hermitian it follows:

\hat{O}^{\dagger}+\hat{O}=\hat{O}'-i\hat{O}''+\hat{O}'+i\hat{O}''=2\hat{O}'

Am I on the right track?
 
Not too bad ...
 
XD Too bad? XD

For the i(\hat{O}^\dagger-\hat{O}) part I got 2\hat{O}''

So I should somehow prove linear superposition or?
 
Well, so what is your guess for O' and O''? Guess what they should be, then check carefully if your guess has all the required properties.

This is how we often solve problems: we play, we guess, and the we check carefully, in all detail, if our guess really constitutes a solution of the original problem. The way towards a solution does not have to be logical. What needs to be logical is the verification.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top