Can anybody differentiate this to simplest formy=4/3+5cosx

  • Thread starter Thread starter lakshmi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiate
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around differentiating the function y = 4/3 + 5cos(x) and clarifying its correct interpretation, whether as a sum or a fraction. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the derivative of constants and trigonometric functions, specifically noting that the derivative of cos(x) is -sin(x). The quotient rule is discussed for the interpretation of y = 4/(3 + 5cos(x)), leading to a derived formula for differentiation. Additionally, there are mentions of applying L'Hospital's rule for limits and the necessity of understanding chain and product rules in differentiation. Overall, the conversation highlights the nuances of differentiation and the importance of clear function representation.
lakshmi
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
can anybody differentiate this to simplest form
y=4/3+5cosx
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What about trying it out yourself?
What is your specific problem with this?
 
Do you know the derivative of a constant?

Do you know the derivative of cos(x)?
 
for 5cos(x) product rule may be useful
 
By the way, is that (4/3)+ 5cos(x) or 4/(3+5cos(x))?
 
nix: The product rule does not need to be applied as the 5 looks to be independant of x.
 
Hello,
I have a limit to solve which in fact involves differentation (L'Hospital's rule)

Lim as x->inf. (xe^[1/x]-x)
I solved it but I am not quite sure. It can't be solved immediately by substitution because it becomes an undet. form. So applying the Hospital Rule I found Lim as x->inf (e^[1/x] - [(e^{1/x})/x] - 1)
Then it gives e^0 -0-1 = 1-1=0
I don't know now if it's correct because I don't even have a TI calc. to check the answer.
Thanx
 
Your answering a question that is a month old and that isn't the correct solution either.
<br /> y=\frac{4}{3+5\cos{x}}<br />

You can use the quotient rule or change the denomenator to a negative power

Quotient rule:

given a function f(x)
<br /> f(x)=\frac{g(x)}{h(x)}<br />

Then the quotient rule would be:
<br /> f^\prime (x)=\frac{h(x)g^\prime (x)-h^\prime (x)g(x)}{(h(x))^2}<br />

if we let the numerator be g(x) and the denomenator be h(x) we get:
<br /> g(x)=4<br />

<br /> g^\prime (x)=0<br />

<br /> h(x)=3+5\cos{x}<br />

<br /> h^\prime (x)=-5\sin{x}<br />

Plugging the individual functions into the quotient rule yields:
<br /> f^\prime (x)=\frac{(3+5\cos{x})(0)-(-5\sin{x})(4)}{(3+5\cos{x})^2}<br />

simplify:
<br /> f^\prime (x)=\frac{20\sin{x}}{(3+5\cos{x})^2}<br />

If you look at the problem as:
<br /> y=\frac{4}{3}+5\cos{x}<br />

you get:
<br /> y^\prime=-5\sin{x}<br />


[edit]transposed 3 and 4...fixed
 
Last edited:
Your answering a question that is a month old and that isn't the correct solution either.
y= \frac{4}{3+5cos x}
How did you decide that that was the problem? I would think that y= 4/3+ 5 cos x would be more reasonably interpreted as y= (4/3)+ 5 cos x. I asked lakshmi earlier which was intended and got no answer.
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
Your answering a question that is a month old and that isn't the correct solution either.
y= \frac{4}{3+5cos x}
How did you decide that that was the problem? I would think that y= 4/3+ 5 cos x would be more reasonably interpreted as y= (4/3)+ 5 cos x. I asked lakshmi earlier which was intended and got no answer.

I answered both possible forms of the question.

[edit]Also, KnowledgeIsPower you have a misconception about the generel form. the derivative x^n only applies to x^n. You can't apply this to the transcendental functions because each has its own rule. For example: the derivative \ln x is not 1/\ln x as x^n would suggest.

[edit][edit] The response I was addressing seems to have disappeared anyway.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Ok thanks for the information. I just studied a number of new trig content and thought i'd jump right in - though i hadn't done differentiation/integration on trigonomic functions.
My mistake, sorry.

But what prevents you from just classing sinx as 'y' and differentiating that way?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
You can say y=sin x but you have to use the chain rule to get dy/dx.

Here, given: y=sin x and you want to find dy/dx.

let A=sin x

y=A
dy=dA
dy/dA=1

Well that's not what we wnat we are trying to find dy/dx

<br /> \frac{dy}{dx}=\frac{dy}{dA}\frac{dA}{dx}<br />

The above works just like algebra. The dA's will cancel to give dy/dx; however, you must find dA/dx to use the chain rule.

A=sin x
dA=cos xdx
dA/dx=cos x

thus dy/dx=(1)(cos x)
or dy/dx=cos x

back to the original problem: y=sin x
You'll learn this soon enough, but the derivative of sin x is cos x so and the derivative of cos x is -sin x.

thus if we find the derivative of y=sin x we get dy/dx=cos x

I'd liken the process to fractional addition. You can't simply add 1/3 and 1/2 together. You have to first find a common denominator. Here too we can't simply say sin x=A and get the same result as y=sin x. We still need to do the intermediate steps to convert dA/dx and dy/dA to dy/dx.

You'll soon learn that there are 20 to 30 common derivatives you'll need to memorize.

Hope this helped.
 
  • #13
Thanks a lot for the explanation. That was very interesting and informative. Fools rush in..., guess i shouldn't jump ahead.
It's amazing that you people will help those less knowledgeable out for free. It's a pity there's no way to return the favour.
Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top