Can anyone identify this series trick?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deiniol
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Deiniol
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi there, I am reading through a thesis and the author takes the infinite series:

\begin{equation}
u(x,t)=u_0(x)+u_1(x)\cos(\sigma t - \phi_1(x)) + u_1'(x)\cos(\sigma' t - \phi'_1(x))+\ldots
\end{equation}

and by letting σr be the difference between the frequencies σ and σ' changes the above to:

\begin{equation}
u=u_0+u_1\cos(n\sigma_rt-\phi_1) + u_1'\cos([n+\beta]\sigma_rt-\phi_1')+\ldots
\end{equation}

where β=±1 and n is an integer. I don't follow the manipulation from the first equation to the other, I just wondered if anyone is familiar with this trick and might be able to talk me through it. Many thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This would be unproblematic is if ##n=\sigma/\sigma_r## is not assumed to be an integer. It seems wrong otherwise, if ##u_1'=0## for example. So either this is wrong or ##n=\sigma/\sigma_r## should be assumed to be an integer, by some reason.
 
Thanks for the reply Erland. The reason for the change is to eventually get u(x,t)|u(x,t)| into a form suitable for a Fourier expansion. I think that by letting θ=σt-Φ1 and α=σrt+Φ11' where σr=σ-σ' to transform (1) in the OP to:

\begin{equation}
u(x,t)=u_0+u_1\cos(\theta)+u_1'\cos(\theta-\alpha)+u_2\cos(2\theta-[\phi_2-2\phi_1])+u_2'\cos(2\theta-2\alpha-[2\phi_1'+\phi_2'-4\phi_1])+\ldots
\end{equation}

should work fine. Then u|u| can be expanded into a Fourier series of θ.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top