Can Bi-Quadratic Equations Be Represented in 3-Dimensional Graphs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Windseaker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Curves
AI Thread Summary
Bi-quadratic equations can be represented in 3-dimensional graphs, with Z defined as a function of X and Y. The equation Z = a + bX + cX² + dY + eY² + fXY describes a surface in three-dimensional space. To visualize this in two dimensions, one can create contour plots in the XY plane or take slices by setting either X or Y to a constant value. This approach allows for overlapping graphs or simplified representations. Utilizing these methods can effectively illustrate the relationships within the bi-quadratic equation.
Windseaker
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Trying to solve a bi-quadratic eq. so I can graph in in x and y , but Z means this is a 3-D graph? , is it possible to have a overlapping graph or any ideas?? X= +100 &-100

Z= a + bX + cX² + dY + eY² + fXY
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Windseaker said:
Trying to solve a bi-quadratic eq. so I can graph in in x and y , but Z means this is a 3-D graph? , is it possible to have a overlapping graph or any ideas?? X= +100 &-100

Z= a + bX + cX² + dY + eY² + fXY

The equation Z= represents a surface in 3 space, as a function of X and Y. What are you trying to solve?
 
Im trying to break the equation into two parts to graph on a two dimensional axis or overlap the two on one graph, any ideas on dividing the equation into two??
 
Windseaker said:
Im trying to break the equation into two parts to graph on a two dimensional axis or overlap the two on one graph, any ideas on dividing the equation into two??

It depends what you what to show. You could make a contour plot in the xy plane. Or take a slice along some other plane. Just set x or y to a constant and it becomes a 2D graph.
 
too easy, thank you
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top