Can Black Holes Explode Back into Normal Matter After Evaporation?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes are theorized to eventually evaporate through a process known as Hawking radiation, where they lose mass over time. As they shrink, they become hotter and emit increasing amounts of radiation until they reach a critical size, around the Planck scale, at which point they completely evaporate. This evaporation results in a release of high-energy photons and particles rather than a return to normal matter. The process is extremely slow for larger black holes, and they do not explode back into normal matter but rather dissipate into radiation. The discussion highlights the complexities of black hole evaporation and its implications in the context of relativity.
Denton
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
If it is indeed true that black holes (eventually) evaporate, then once they lose enough mass do they then return to become a normal body of matter?

I would assume that once this happens there would be an enormous explosion due to constraints of relativity disappearing.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
For black holes of any significant size, the evaporation rate is rxtremely slow. The stuff coming off would be normal matter, but the black hole itself just keeps getting smaller, but still a black hole, until it disappears.
 
This is just like that other thread! :)

As a black hole evaporates it gets hotter and hotter and radiates more and more until at roughly the Planck size it just evaporates away (hence the name of the process) into a shower of high energy photons and other particles.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top