Can Blood Balls Cool Faster in Vacuum or Air?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the cooling rates of a hypothetical blood ball in both vacuum and air, estimating the time required to cool from 310 K to 285 K. It calculates initial heat loss using empirical measurements, indicating that conductive effects are significantly higher than radiative effects. The total heat released from the blood is substantial, leading to an estimated cooling timescale of approximately 338 days in air, assuming consistent conditions. The conversation also touches on the need for a computational model to simulate these cooling dynamics accurately. The context of using human blood raises playful speculation about vampire themes, particularly with Halloween approaching.
nehorlavazapal
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi,

If we took the blood of all people here on Earth and made a ball of it (r=200, T = 310 K) how long would it take for it to cool down to ~ 285 K in vacuum (absent of sunglight)? How long would it take to cool down in air, with reasonable conduction speeds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
empirical measurements can be used to approximate this to something like 10 W/m^2*K in air, where the K comes from the temperature difference between the ball and the air.

So for example your initial heat loss would be (4/3)*pi*200^2*10*(310 - 285), surface area times 10 times temperature difference. As the body cools this heat loss will drop as the surface temperature (310) will not be a constant, so you're solving a differential equation here.

Conductive effects are usually a lot higher, radiation will be a lot lower.

The link between heat flux and time to steady-state temperature is entirely governed by the heat capacity of the object.
 
The total heat released will be 4180 J per kg × 25 × 35 billion = 3,65 × 10^15 J.

Wow, that's a lot of heat stored in human blood! S = 502 000 m^2. So in total each m^2 would need to radiate/conduct 7,2×10^9 J. That's a lot. Can somebody offer a model in some kind of computer program? This is basic stuff, so many programs should do the trick!
 
Using your values, the initial energy loss is 10W/(m^2*K) * 25K * 500 000m^2 = 125MW.
Assuming the interior conducts much better than the air/bubble surface, this gives a timescale of 7.2GJ/(125MW) = 338 days.

Assuming the air around the ball won't heat too much, this leads to an exponential decay of the temperature with a timescale of roughly one year.
WolframAlpha Plot (x in days, y in K)

Why human blood?
 
Must be a vampire or represent vampire related interests. After all, it's only a fortnight to Halloween!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top