Can Boolean Algebra Simplify Complex Logical Expressions?

dagg3r
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Boolean Algebra Hard!

hey all, got stuck on some boolean algebra just wondering if you all can check my working out thanks :)
basically the ` represent bar's and in the example no. 1 the p is barred, r is barred,and the overall function is barred hope you get the gist of things thanks

1. [(p` + qr)(pq+r`)]`

my working out is, using de morgan's rule
= [(p` + qr)]` + [(pq + r`)]
= p``*(qr)` + r``*(pq)`
=p*(qr)` + r*(pq)` \\ De morgan's rule again
= P( q` + r` ) + r(P` + q`) \\ expanded out
= pq` + r`p + rp` + q`r
\\ i use the rule that r`p + rp` = `
thus = q`(R + p)

is that right hopefully i did it correctly :)

2. (z + (x*y`)) + yx + (x*(y` + z))
thats the function my working out is i expanded it out.
thus
= (z +xy`) + yx + xy` + zx
\\ then i left it as it is as use many of the boolean rules and got
xy` +Z + YX
X(Y` + y)+ z
=X + z
\\i used the karnaugh maps and got x + z to be the simpliest function as well but was wondering ifanyone can check this out for me thanks.


3. [x` + (y`*z`)][yz` + x`][y`+z`]
= [x` + z`y`][x` + yz`][y` + z`]
\\then i used the rule that P(P+Q)=P so that means taking x` as a common factor takinga look at the first 2 functions out ofthe 3
= x`(yz` + x`)
=x` \\ now we have (y` + z`) left as a function thus
= x`(y`+z`)
\\ using de morgan's rule
=(x+yz)`

is that the simpliestform and how would i draw this as a simplified switchinig circuit because i believe the whole function barred you can't draw it?

thats all hope this isn't a load of gibberish :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\\ i use the rule that r`p + rp` = `
I'm not sure of this rule. Suppose r = 0, p = 1, then r'p = 1*1 = 1, so 1 + rp' = 1 which is not equal to 0 or '.

Number 2 is correct. You will just use the fact that x + xA where A can be anything will just be x, and you'll find you have an x swallowing up everything, there's no need for Karnaugh maps. 3 is right. You can always bar a whole circuit. How you bar it depends on what gates you have available to you, but the following two ways work:

Use an AND and an OR gate to make x+yz, then use an inverter gate to bar it. Otherwise, use a NAND gate and NAND x+yz with itself. If you can bar a single thing like x, y, or z, then you can bar any larger expression. And I believe this way will be better then doing x'(y' + z') because you'd need to bar 3 things.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top