Can Circular Motion Be Calculated Like Linear Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter clm222
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity
AI Thread Summary
Circular motion can be analyzed using principles similar to linear motion, but specific conditions must be met regarding the direction of force application. If the force is applied in the direction of circular motion, the arc length can be calculated using the formula d = (Ft^2)/(2m). However, angular velocity cannot simply be derived from total distance divided by radius; it requires a different approach. When the force is applied perpendicular to the ball's motion, the speed remains constant, and the distance traveled can be calculated using d = v_it + (Ft^2)/(2m). Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately applying linear motion equations to circular scenarios.
clm222
Hi, quick question
I've just started to learn circular motion and i tried a basic force problem.

Imagine there is a ball on a string with a string length 'r', and a ball mass 'm'.
You apply a force 'F' for one second. Can the arc length of the ball's motion be calculated the same as linear motion? d=\frac{F{t^2}}{2m} (replacing acceleration with F/m, vi=0)
Can I also go as far as the find the angular velocity by dividing by the radius?
ω=\frac{F{t^2}}{2mr}

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where, and in which direction, do you apply the force?
If the force is always in direction of the circular motion (as forced by the string), that works. However, angular velocity after the acceleration is not the total distance divided by the radius. That is the angle, not its velocity.
 
oh ok,
so if i were to have the force constantly be applied perpendicular to the ball than i CAN use the distance formula?

if so, let's say the ball has initial velocity 'vi', and a force is applied, the final velocity can be calculated using {v_f}={v_i}+\frac{Ft}{m}, could i also calculate the distance travled: d={v_i}t+\frac{F{t^2}}{2m} ?
 
If the force is applied perpendicular to the motion of the ball then its speed is constant. The distance around the circle in time t is v_it.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top