B Can Classical Forces Explain Nuclear Fission and Fusion Reactions?

mark57
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
good morning,
I'd like to know if exsists a classical explanation and, of course, qualitative about the nuclear fission / fusion reactions.
I would like to explain the development of external energy to considering only nuclear forces system
in terms of internal mechanical energy and the fact that all forces are conservative.

thank you
mark
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electromagnetic interaction together with a short-range nuclear interaction of classical nucleons (both parts of the semi-empirical mass formula) is sufficient to get some idea why fission of heavy elements and fusion of light elements can release energy.
You won't understand the neutron to proton ratio in nuclei, beta decays, proton-proton fusion, the lack of helium+helium fusion and many other things with this simplified model, however.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top