Can conservation of energy be applied to this problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sferics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exam
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of conservation of energy and angular momentum in the context of a rocket's elliptical orbit. The original poster explores whether conservation principles are valid given that mass is expelled for thrust. They derive equations for both conservation laws but question the implications of external torque and mass changes on the rocket's speed. A response clarifies that the spaceship's mass is negligible, allowing the conservation of energy to be applied without concern for expelled mass. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying these conservation principles in orbital mechanics.
Sferics
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://www.aapt.org/physicsteam/2010/upload/2010_FmaSolutions.pdf
#25

Homework Equations



\taunet = 0 \Rightarrow Lo = L
Conservation of Mechanical Energy

The Attempt at a Solution



I started by writing two equations: one for conservation of angular momentum and one for conservation of mechanical energy for the two given points of the elliptical orbit. This gave me,

3/2vo2 = GM/(2R)

Obviously taking the square root provides the answer given. And I know that sqrt[GM/(2R)] is an equation for the speed of a particle in a circular orbit. However, something does not seem quite right here.

Is it valid to apply conservation of energy? Is mass not expelled to thrust the rocket? Moreover, by applying conservation of mechanical energy instead to the maximum distance point on the elliptical orbit and any point on the circular orbit, would then the speed not remain remain vo due to the potential energy not changing (same radius)?

I also tried applying the conservation of angular momentum to the same two points. Following that logic, I also reached the conclusion that the speed not remained vo, also because the radius did not change. Since this is wrong, it lead me to question whether the external torque really was zero... is it incorrect to regard the rocket thrust as an internal torque?

I guess what I am asking here is for an outline of the correct thought process involved in solving this problem. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sferics said:
Is it valid to apply conservation of energy? Is mass not expelled to thrust the rocket?

Your approach is perfect.
The mass of the spaceship is given to be negligible. So don't worry about mass being expelled.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top