Can convergent nozzles convert heat into motion?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the potential for convergent and convergent-divergent nozzles to convert internal heat into motion, specifically examining the relationship between internal enthalpy, dynamic pressure, and the thermodynamic principles governing these processes. Participants explore theoretical implications, practical applications, and the underlying physics involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that convergent and/or convergent-divergent nozzles can convert internal enthalpy into forward motion, questioning whether internal heat contributes to this process.
  • Others present equations and diagrams to illustrate how temperature and pressure changes relate to kinetic energy, suggesting that heat can be transformed into motion under isentropic conditions.
  • A participant proposes that using a nozzle at the exit of a compressor could reduce power consumption by converting internal energy into dynamic pressure, raising questions about the first law of thermodynamics.
  • In contrast, some participants argue that while nozzles can adjust flow conditions, they do not add energy to the system, thus power remains constant throughout the process.
  • There is a discussion about the limits of converting heat into velocity, with references to theoretical maximums such as infinite Mach numbers and the implications of reaching absolute zero temperature.
  • Participants engage in mathematical derivations to support their claims, discussing the relationships between enthalpy, velocity, and temperature in the context of ideal gas behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether convergent nozzles can effectively reduce power consumption in compression processes. While some support the idea that internal heat can be converted into motion, others challenge this notion, emphasizing the conservation of energy and the limits imposed by thermodynamic laws. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific assumptions about the fluid behavior, the ideal gas model, and the conditions under which the nozzle operates. Unresolved mathematical steps and interpretations of thermodynamic principles contribute to the complexity of the discussion.

  • #91
pranj5 said:
It's a homemade experiment and laboratory like perfection can't be expected.

Take your photo, open up MS paint or whatever image editor you prefer, and draw on it where objects are located. Annotate it. Don't get snippy with us when we tell you that what you have posted doesn't make any sense as it is presented. That sort of attitude is not any way to get people to help.

pranj5 said:
As far as I know, we can study the effect of temperature to air by adjusting the infrared. Actually, I can't say much about that as my friend is the expert. He has adjusted the camera to detect whether the air coming out is colder or not. But I can say that the picture isn't something made with animation. It's real!

A couple points here:
  1. You shouldn't interpret results when you don't understand how those results were obtained. That's a fundamentally flawed method of experimentation. I'd suggest you go back and try to understand exactly what it is you are measuring.
  2. You really need to explain your experimental setup better if you want us to be able to help you with that. You still haven't clarified what you did or how you were even able to see the air through the tube. At any rate, my suspicion is that you are actually measuring the temperature of a surface somewhere that may be in contact with the air, so given enough time, it should tell you the temperature of the air at that location.
pranj5 said:
Now, anybody can calculate that whenever the pressure difference is 3 bar and above, the flow coming out will be supersonic.

I still would like you to address my earlier question about this, please. Show me why this is true. Prove it to me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K