Can Cosine Affect Whether Three Nonzero Vectors Must Lie in the Same Plane?

yosheey
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If there are three nonzero vectors..
Do you think cosine effects this example:show the three vectors must lie in the same plane?
-------------
* -->dot product
X -->cross product
--------------
A*(BXC)=0

so we can change as..

|A||B||C|sin\alphacos\beta=0

then... we can meet

sin\alphacos\beta=0

so ...

Exactly sin can make vectors lie in same plane if sin=0 (because three of two vectors have same direction...)
but I'm not sure cos effects...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the direction of the vector that results from a cross product?

Do you know how to write, in vector form, that two vectors are perpendicular to each other?

Don't worry so much about sine and cosine effects per se, but think about the two questions above. They are the answer to your problem.
 
yosheey said:
|A||B||C|sin\alphacos\beta=0

Hi yosheey! :smile:

Your approach is fundamentally wrong, because that equation only deals with the magnitude of the final result.

You must use a method that deals with the directions of the intermediate stages. :wink:
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top