Can δ-ε Definitions Prove This Infinite Limit Scenario?

Jimbo57
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove, using the formal definition of limits:

If lim (x->inf) g(x) = inf and g(x) leq f(x) for x->a, then lim (x->a) f(x)=inf.

leq = less than or equal to.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Honestly, I'm not even sure where to start on this one. Anyone bored enough to show how they would solve it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start with the δ-ε definition of a limit.

Show some work so we can help you. That's a rule for this Forum.

BTW: Don't you mean lim (x → a) g(x) = ∞ , NOT lim (x → ∞) ?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top