Can diagonal vectors prove that orthogonal diagonals create a square rectangle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kidia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rectangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that orthogonal diagonals in a rectangle indicate it is a square. By setting up a coordinate system with corners at (0,0), (w,0), (0,h), and (w,h), the diagonals are represented by the vectors wi + hj and -wi + hj. The condition for orthogonality is that the dot product of these vectors equals zero. Calculating the dot product reveals that w and h must be equal, confirming that the rectangle is indeed a square. This mathematical proof highlights the relationship between the properties of diagonals and the shape of the rectangle.
kidia
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I have problem on this one:

Using vectors,show that if a diagonals of rectangle are orthogonal then the rectangle must be square.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Set up a coordinate system so that one corner of the rectangle is at the origin, the two sides are along the positive x and y axes. Then the corners of the rectangle are at (0,0), (w,0), (0,h), (w,h).

One of the diagonals, from (0,0) to (w,h) is given by the vector wi+ hj.
The other, from (w,0) to (0,h) is given by the vector -wi+ hj

If the two diagonals are orthogonal then their dot product must be 0.

What IS the dot product of wi+ hj and -wi+ hj?

What does that tell you about w and h?
 
super,thanx professor
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top