Can Distance Alone Prove Gravitational Binding?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies Bound
AI Thread Summary
Distance alone cannot prove gravitational binding between two bodies; it requires knowledge of their masses and velocities. Without this information, it's impossible to determine if one body is in orbit, moving away, or falling towards another. To assess gravitational binding accurately, one must consider position, velocity, and mass. While calculating the Milky Way's motion towards the Great Attractor is complex, estimates of mass and velocity can provide insights into gravitational interactions. Thus, a comprehensive understanding of these factors is essential for proving gravitational binding.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Can the distance between two bodies be calculated to prove they are gravitationally bound?

Use two bodies with known mass.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You need to know velocity as well as distance in order to know this. If you took a snapshot of the Earth and the Moon you wouldn't know whether the Moon was in orbit, moving away from the Earth at sufficient velocity to escape or indeed plunging straight towards it!

Edit: you would also need to know that masses, since that will tell you what velocities would indicate stable orbits. So that's three things, position, velocity and mass.
 
Thankyou Wallace.

From that i guess there is no way the milky way and its motion towards the great attractor could be proven by calculation to be cause by gravity?
 
No, since we can get an estimate of the masses of the bodies involved and measure velocities via redshift, hence we have (to some level of precision) the three things I mentioned.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top