Can Electric Fields be Discontinuous? - Conservation of Charge

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of electric fields in relation to the conservation of charge and Maxwell's equations. Participants explore whether electric fields can be discontinuous and the implications of such discontinuities on the application of Maxwell's equations, particularly in differential form.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that electric fields are generally continuous, allowing for the exchange of derivatives in Gauss' law, but questions if discontinuities can occur in nature.
  • Another participant raises the question of whether Maxwell's equations or charge conservation is more fundamental, noting that charge conservation can be derived from Maxwell's equations but is conceptually distinct.
  • A response highlights the complexity of defining "fundamental" and discusses the relationship between charge conservation and Maxwell's equations, emphasizing the role of gauge symmetry and Noether's Theorem.
  • Concerns are expressed about deriving charge conservation from Maxwell's equations in cases where the electric field may not be continuous, with specific mathematical expressions referenced.
  • One participant asserts that if the electric field is discontinuous, it would complicate the application of Maxwell's equations in differential form, but suggests that charge conservation can still be proven using integral forms around isolated points.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of delta functions and distributions, suggesting they may allow for the continued use of Maxwell's equations even in the presence of discontinuities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the continuity of electric fields and the implications for charge conservation. There is no consensus on whether electric fields can be discontinuous or how this affects the application of Maxwell's equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific mathematical formulations and concepts, such as Gauss' law, Ampere-Maxwell's law, and delta functions, indicating a reliance on certain assumptions and mathematical frameworks that may not be universally accepted or resolved within the discussion.

mfduqued
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I show the conservation of charge from the equations of MAxwell, but I suppose that an electric field is continuous at space and time, therefore I can exchange the derivates from Gauss' law, at time's derivate of this law..

My question is, At nature Can I have an electric field discontinued, therefore I can't exchange the derivates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, my question What is more fundamental, the maxwall'equations or charge conservation?, because I obtain from gass' law and Ampre-Maxwell's law of charge conservation, but this law is appart from other laws.

Then I can say, but I can prove this law (charge conservation) in continuous situations, this law is apart from the other equations of Maxwell?
 
The "what is more fundamental" question an be tricky, "fundamental in what sense?" is the begged question.

From an empirical operational point of view we measure E-M fields and thence confirm Maxwell's equations using test charges and so we must first observe charge as a conserved quantity.

From a theory development perspective you have a set of mutually necessary conditions and you can pick where you start and so pick what is fundamental vs what is derived however the current modern approach is to start with a gauge symmetry which in a very immediate way implies a conservation principle via Noether's Theorem. One then derives Maxwell's equations. But there is no reason to believe the gauge approach is starting at a more fundamental level in some other sense. It is simply a means of encoding a class of theories which contain certain common and commonly observed features such as conservation of charge.

At a metaphysical level the universe simply is as it is an doesn't order the features of nature as more an less fundamental, that is really an ordering we impose based on the way we conceptually decompose natural phenomena to better understand it.

We can view charge as geometric artifacts of the fields, or the fields as propagation of charge displacements and it becomes a chicken and egg loop.

That having been said, the answer to your questions is... most definitely charge conservation is more fundamental!
 
Thank jambaugh for your response,

But I have a question,
I always can to obtain the equation of charge conservation, from Maxwell's equations, although the field is not continuous at space-time?

This subject is because I think at some situations to obtain the charge conservation is not easy, as,
[itex]\frac{∂∇\bullet D}{∂t}=\frac{∂ρ}{ε_0 ∂t}=\frac{∇\bullet ∂D}{∂t}[/itex]
and I use the Ampere-Maxwell 's equation
 
mfduqued said:
I show the conservation of charge from the equations of MAxwell, but I suppose that an electric field is continuous at space and time, therefore I can exchange the derivates from Gauss' law, at time's derivate of this law..

My question is, At nature Can I have an electric field discontinued, therefore I can't exchange the derivates?

If the field is discontinuous you would not even be able to differentiate it, leave alone exchange derivatives. So you would not be able to apply the Maxwell equations in differential form, leave alone charge conservation. In practice most of the situations would be where the field is continuous everywhere except at a few isolated points where it may not be due to the point charge concept. If you are worried about charge conservation in such cases, you don't have to be, because you can integrate the current density over an arbitrarity small closed surface surrounding the point and use the integral form of Maxwell's equations to prove charge conservation around that point.
Frankly, I would suggest focus more on the Physics, and don't get boggled too much by mathematical technicalities.
 
Last edited:
Thank physwizard for your response.

Yes, I had this doubt when I couldn't use the Maxwell's Equations Differential.
 
Last edited:
Frankly, I am not an expert on this subject. In the case of the field blowing up at a few isolated points, I feel that you can still continue to use Maxwell's equations in differential form and the concept of delta functions will facilitate this.
You could try reading up a bit on delta functions and the theory of distributions.
You have raised a valid point and I encourage you to pursue it further. If you gain a greater understanding of this, do post here on the forum!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K