Can Electrons and Protons Create a Neutral Particle at Rest?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Brewer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assumptions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the collision between electrons and protons to create a neutral particle, with emphasis on determining the maximum mass of this particle. The scenario assumes both the electron and proton are stationary after the collision, which is analyzed in the center of mass frame. Conservation of energy and momentum principles are applied to derive the mass of the new particle, denoted as mq. The maximum mass is calculated using the total energy before the collision, factoring in the kinetic energy of the electron and the rest mass of the proton. The final equation provides a method to compute mq based on these variables, ensuring all particles are at rest post-collision.
Brewer
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm not going to write the full question as its not neccessary, but this is the gist of it.

Electrons are fired at protons and a search is made for a neutral particle created in the impact. Both the electron and proton still exist after the impact, along with this new particle. What is the maximum mass that can be produced. Use any reasonable approximations, but justify your arguments.

Basically it strikes me that the maximum mass of this new particle would be in the case that both the electron and proton are stationary after the collision. But is this a physically possible scenario??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Brewer said:

Homework Statement


I'm not going to write the full question as its not neccessary, but this is the gist of it.

Electrons are fired at protons and a search is made for a neutral particle created in the impact. Both the electron and proton still exist after the impact, along with this new particle. What is the maximum mass that can be produced. Use any reasonable approximations, but justify your arguments.

Basically it strikes me that the maximum mass of this new particle would be in the case that both the electron and proton are stationary after the collision. But is this a physically possible scenario??

Yes, stationary in the center of mass frame.
 
Just take the kinetic energy of the initially moving electron and set that energy to equal mc^2 after the collision and you have the mass of the new particle.
 
In this case is it the case that:

(\Sigma E)^2 - (\Sigma p)^2 = (m_e + m_p + m_Q)^2

I'm using the non SI units that allow c to equal one.

so (\Sigma E)^2 = Ee = {p_e}^2+{m_e}^2, (\Sigma P) = {p_e}^2

Therefore:
{m_e}^2 = {m_e}^2 + {m_p}^2 + {m_Q}^2 + 2{m_e}{m_p} + 2{m_p}{m_Q} + 2{m_e}{m_Q}

From here I seem a little confused. I can't seem to rearrange to solve for mQ (which I just realized I haven't explicitly defined as my name for the new particle). Any help would be appreciated, but I will be banging on with it in the mean time.

Thanks
 
I think I have some working wrong here - please ignore. I will be going to see lecturers and/or peers tomorrow about this problem.
 
You just write down conservation of four momentum:

p1 + p2 = p1' + p2' + pq

Then you reason as follows. If the mass of the new particle is maximal, then you are at threshold. In the center of mass frame the total momentum is zero, and then all the 3-momenta on the right hand side are zero. You can then extract the mass of the q-particle using conservation of energy. So, all you need to know is the energy of the electron + proton before the collision in the center of mass frame, but that's just the invariant mass. If E is the total energy in tthe COM frame then (1 = electron, 2 = proton, q = neutral particle):

E^2 = (p1 + p2)^2 = p1^2 + p2^2 + 2 p1 dot p2 =

m1^2 + m2^2 + 2 E_e m2 (if proton was initially at rest) =

m1^2 + m2^2 + 2 (Eekin + m1) m2 =

(m1 + m2 )^2 + 2 Eekin m2

So, the energy is:

E = sqrt[(m1 + m2 )^2 + 2 Eekin m2]

The total energy in the COM frame after the collision is:

m1 + m2 + mq, because all the particles are at rest. Therefore:

mq = sqrt[(m1 + m2 )^2 + 2 Eekin m2] - m1 - m2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top