B Can Energy Really Transform into Matter at CERN?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter BlueQuark
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Matter
BlueQuark
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Okay, this quite confuses me. "Energy" isn't anything physical. You can't point at energy. It's more of a property, like length. The definition of kinetic energy is ## ke = .5mv^2##.

Now, how can something like an abstract property turn into matter? An example being CERN, when new particles are created from energy when particles with high energy smash into each other.

Please let me know if I got something wrong, thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BlueQuark said:
Now, how can something like an abstract property turn into matter?
That isn't quite accurate. A better way to say it is that particles with a given amount of this abstract property can turn into other particles with the same amount of this abstract property.
 
Dale said:
That isn't quite accurate. A better way to say it is that particles with a given amount of this abstract property can turn into other particles with the same amount of this abstract property.
Okay, that does make a bit more sense. Do we know how exactly they turn into different particles though?
 
  • Like
Likes hsdrop
BlueQuark said:
Okay, that does make a bit more sense. Do we know how exactly they turn into different particles though?
That is a large part of what the standard model explains. I don't know it well enough to explain it, but I would recommend asking that question in the QM forum. Be warned, there probably is not a B level answer.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Back
Top