Can Graduate School Recommendations Come from Employers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scott1972
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When applying to graduate school for physics after a decade away from academia, securing strong recommendation letters can be challenging. Academic references are typically preferred, particularly from professors familiar with the applicant's undergraduate work. If it's been too long since the applicant's studies, former professors may struggle to provide meaningful insights. It's advisable to obtain at least one recommendation from an undergraduate professor, as their evaluations are more relevant to academic contexts. However, recommendations from recent employers are also valuable, especially if they can highlight skills like adaptability and the ability to learn new concepts. A balanced approach, combining academic and professional references, can strengthen the application.
Scott1972
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm applying to graduate school for physics and am wondering what to do about recommendations.

It has been more than 10 years since I received my undergraduate degrees in math and physics and since then I've bounced around between the military, writing software, and doing system administration.

Do the recommendations need to be from academics sources or can I have my most recent employers write them?

If they must be from former teachers is it acceptable to request them from professors from long ago?

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They usually have to be from academic sources. If you ever did any kind of undergraduate research, the supervisor would be the person to ask for a reference. Although it may be possible to get references from former profs, ten years is a long time, and if they cannot recall who you are, then they won't have anything to say.

Getting reference letters is one tough process if you never did any academic research, and I'm glad I got it over with.

-Good luck.
 
I have seen recommendations from nearly every source- academic, summer job, etc.

I would suggest you try and get at least one recommendation from one of your undergraduate professors, which may not be easy given the time lag. But, those letters are the easiest to place into an academic context (meaning the qualities they are evaluating you on are academic in nature, not industrial/military). That is, a reference saying you are a great employee is fine, but being a great employee requires different skills than being a great student.

However, it's also important to have a recommendation from someone who knows you more recently as well. You used the phrase "bounced around..", do you have any (professional) reference who has known you for more than a few years? If you have a few candidates, make sure they understand to emphasize things like 'learning new skills', 'can train others', etc. etc.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Back
Top