Can gravitational field strength equal the centripetal acceleration?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between gravitational field strength and centripetal acceleration, particularly in the context of Earth's rotation. It explores the condition under which objects at the equator would experience weightlessness, indicating that gravitational force must equal centripetal force for this to occur. The equation derived shows that when the normal force is zero, the centripetal force required for circular motion equals the gravitational force. The conclusion drawn is that for weightlessness at the equator, the gravitational field strength must equal the centripetal acceleration. This highlights the interplay between gravity and motion in a rotating system.
TN17
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
As a homework question, it asks, "...if the Earth were rotating so fast that the objects at the equator were apparently weightless?"

Somewhere, someone said that, quote:
In order for the rotation of the Earth to cancel weight, the gravitational field strength should equal the centripetal accel. (v^2/R)

Do they mean g=a(centripetal)?
I don't get how that makes sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The object on the equator moves along a circle of radius of the Earth (R) with the velocity of the equator (v). The centripetal force needed to this motion is provided by gravity Fg=GmM/R^2 (M is the mass of Earth) and the normal force N acting between the object and ground:

mv^2/R=GmM/R^2+N.

The object is weigthless if the ground does not push it upward, and the object does not push the ground, that is N=0. the If the normal force is 0 the centripetal force is equal to gravity at the equator.

mv^2/R=GmM/R^2

The gravitational field strength is Fg/m. Dividing the previous equation by m,

Fg/m = G M/R^2= v^2/R.

ehild
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top