Can Gravitons Be Detected with Particle Accelerators?

kritanta2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
my project is about the search for the graviton, i know we are using particle accelerators to try to find out about them however we cannot detect them still, but we can prove they exist, i am having trouble explaining what is actually being done to detect them in any kind of detail. and the implications of this? or possible theory's to explain why we can't find them please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gravitons, the search for

my project is about the search for the graviton, i know we are using particle accelerators to try to find out about them however we cannot detect them still, but we can prove they exist, i am having trouble explaining what is actually being done to detect them in any kind of detail. and the implications of this? or possible theory's to explain why we can't find them please help.
 
No one is making a serious attempt to detect gravitons at an accelerator or anywhere else. They are the quantum of an EXTREMELY weak force that we don't even know how to quantize. The prospect of detecting them individually, like we do photons is extremely dim. There speculative ideas that funny things may happen with gravity at the TeV scale and the LHC may spit out mini black holes, But those notions are, well, speculative. There is a serious effort to detect classical gravity waves with experiments like LIGO and VIRGO. Look those up. That would be much more fertile ground for your project.
 
kritanta2 said:
my project is about the search for the graviton, i know we are using particle accelerators to try to find out about them however we cannot detect them still, but we can prove they exist, i am having trouble explaining what is actually being done to detect them in any kind of detail. and the implications of this? or possible theory's to explain why we can't find them please help.

What "project" would this be? I presume this isn't a project that you've been set in, say, school or university?
 
Oh crap I just realized she was talking about the graviton. Ignore my post. :smile: I just presumed that was what she meant without reading it too carefully. :rolleyes:

To be honest, looking for the Higgs Boson is more likely to provide fruitful atm, so I doubt anyone is going to put the cart before the horse.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top