I Can I detect electrons using X-ray film?

onehj832
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
electron detection using x-ray film
I'm conducting a research about making a electron gun. I first tried to detect electron using nuclear emulsion plate. But I couldn't purchase one near my town. So, instead, I'm thinking about using a x-ray film to detect electron. But I'm not sure it'll work.
SO, IS IT POSSIBLE TO DETECT ELECTRONS USING THE X-RAY FILM?🤔
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can definitely put film (x-ray or normal B/W) into a vacuum chamber and expose it with a cathode ray.

In the mid '70's, I was working on a contract for the US Defense Mapping Agency, Aerospace Center in Saint Louis. The final product they produced was on paper that only needed to last about 2 months (because the charts expired and were superseded in that time), so the quality of the paper was not good.

Despite this, the output device they chose (for the print signatures - about 16 pages at a time) was called an "Electron Beam Recorder" and had the ability to draw incredibly fine text and graphics - with a positioning resolution of 40,000 per inch and a film format about 5 inches wide and up to about 8 inches long.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes onehj832
Yes. You might consider 35mm B&W film. It will be cheaper and you can develop it yourself, which could give you quicker results and save money.
 
  • Like
Likes onehj832
I processed the EBR film exactly as I would B/W 35mm film - using a Kodak developer, an acetic acid stop, and then the fixer.
However, it occurs to me that the film itself needed to be grounded and must have been electrically conductive. Otherwise, a charge could have built up on the film and that would have distorted the image.

It's not clear that a silver halide gelatin would be naturally conductive. So there could be a grounding problem. You could put a light coat of fabric softener on the plastic side to make it conductive - but that might not do the emulsion any good - where the charge is going to be building up.

Of course, putting softener on the emulsion side might shield it from the electrons. I would experiment with a thin coat of very dilute fabric softener - and then let it dry. Of course, you would need to do that entirely in the dark.
 
  • Like
Likes onehj832 and DaveE
Thank you so much! It really helped me a lot! :)
 
DaveE said:
Yes. You might consider 35mm B&W film. It will be cheaper and you can develop it yourself, which could give you quicker results and save money.
Thank you for your kind advice! 😁
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top