Can I get some physicists opinion on this experiment

AI Thread Summary
The experiment aims to demonstrate a violation of angular momentum in a closed system, where two sources of torque—one from a motor and another from chain tension—act on the apparatus. In the first experiment, the motor's torque exceeds that of the chain, while in the second, the chain's torque is greater. Despite being a closed system with no external torque, the setup intends to illustrate differing outcomes in angular momentum based on the torque sources. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding torque interactions and their implications for angular momentum conservation. The thread has been locked, indicating that further discussion is contingent upon publication in a scientific journal.
experiment
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can I get some peoples opinion on this experiment.
experimentdemonstration.jpg
In this experiment I should clarify. The apparatus is initially at rest. The end spin of the apparatus will be the same in both experiments and in experiment 1 and 2 there will be two sources of torque acting on the apparatus- torque from the motor and torque from the tension in the chain. In both experiments the torques should be the same but in opposite directions. In experiment 1 the torque from the motor will be greater then the torque applied by the chain however in experiment 2 the torque applied by the chain will be greater then the torque applied by the motor.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The title of your experiment is "Demsonstrating Violation of Angular Momentum". If you have an external torque acting on the system, angular momentum will not be conserved...
 
There will not me external torque acting on the apparatus. Its a closed system. The sources for torque acting on the apparatus will be from the motors attached to the rod and by the tension in the chain. The points of force applied to the rod by the chain will occur at object x (as depiced) but also at tangents to wheel B and the pulley(which is attached to wheel A).
 
experiment said:
Can I get some peoples opinion on this experiment. View attachment 42840In this experiment I should clarify. The apparatus is initially at rest. The end spin of the apparatus will be the same in both experiments and in experiment 1 and 2 there will be two sources of torque acting on the apparatus- torque from the motor and torque from the tension in the chain. In both experiments the torques should be the same but in opposite directions. In experiment 1 the torque from the motor will be greater then the torque applied by the chain however in experiment 2 the torque applied by the chain will be greater then the torque applied by the motor.

experiment said:
There will not me external torque acting on the apparatus. Its a closed system. The sources for torque acting on the apparatus will be from the motors attached to the rod and by the tension in the chain. The points of force applied to the rod by the chain will occur at object x (as depiced) but also at tangents to wheel B and the pulley(which is attached to wheel A).

So then you are trying to show that you can violate conservation of angular momentum in a closed system, eh?

This thread is locked. You can re-post after you get your experiment published in a mainstream scientific journal.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How Does Torque Affect Balance on a Self-Balancing Electric Unicycle?
Replies
10
Views
3K
B Lever balancing physics (video game design)
Replies
18
Views
2K
I I'm calculating more energy out than I put in
3
Replies
138
Views
7K
I Stern-Gerlach experiment with a classical object
Replies
2
Views
1K
I PIGA: Pendulous Integrating Gyroscopic Accelerometer
Replies
0
Views
1K
I Exit velocity through a nozzle: Bernoulli vs. Experience
Replies
7
Views
3K
B A car collides with a bus, who experiences a greater change in momentum?
Replies
10
Views
1K
I A scientific analysis of stopping the spin of Discovery One spaceship
Replies
3
Views
2K
What torque-speed curve should I use for my stepper motor selection?
Replies
14
Views
2K
B Sign conventions in torque and non-uniform circular motion
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top