Can I have different wavenumber and frequency in E and B for a plane e

christianpoved
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To solve the wave equations in vacuum for ##\vec{E}## and ##\vec{B}## we made the ansatz:

\begin{array}{cc}
\vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right)=\vec{E}_{0}\cos\left(\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}-\omega t+\delta\right)
\vec{B}\left(\vec{r},t\right)=\vec{B}_{0}\cos\left(\vec{k}\cdot\vec{r}-\omega t+\delta\right)
\end{array}

Make a new ansatz of the form:

\begin{array}{cc}
\vec{E}\left(\vec{r},t\right)=\vec{E}_{0}\cos\left(\vec{k}\cdot \vec{r}-\omega t+\delta\right)
\vec{B}\left(\vec{r},t\right)=\vec{B}_{0}\cos\left(\vec{k}^{\prime} \cdot \vec{r}-omega^{\prime}t+\delta^{\prime}\right)
\end{array}

And show either that

\begin{array}{cc}
\vec{k}=\vec{k}^{\prime}
\omega=\omega^{\prime}
\end{array}

Or that, in general:

\begin{array}{cc}
\vec{k}^{\prime}\left(\omega^{\prime}\right)=\vec{k}\left(\omega\right)
\end{array}

Homework Equations



I used Maxwell equations and some cross/dot product identities.

The Attempt at a Solution



I put these new fields into Maxwell equations and i get this

\begin{array}{cc}
\vec{E}\cdot\vec{k}=0 & \mbox{(1)}\\
\vec{B}\cdot\vec{k}^{\prime}=0 & \mbox{(2)}\\
\vec{k}\times\vec{E}=\omega^{\prime}\vec{B} & \mbox{(3)}\\
\vec{k}^{\prime}\times\vec{B}=-\frac{\vec{k}\cdot\vec{k}}{\omega}\vec{E} & \mbox{(4)}
\end{array}

With these equations I can show that both wavenumbers are parallel, and that the factor between them is the ratio of the frequencies, shouldn't I be able to show that the frequencies are the same and then conclude that the wavenumbers are equal too?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try to derive (3) with respect to time? Afterwards, combine (3) and its derivative.
 
Thanks! I ended up solving it yesterday taking the curl in 3, but taking the time derivative works as well. :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top