Can I Propel a Boat with a Speaker?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HappyEngineer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boat
AI Thread Summary
Calculating the propulsive force produced by a speaker involves understanding sound pressure and its effects on movement. A speaker theoretically generates force based on sound pressure, but real-world factors like air resistance and friction complicate this. The discussion suggests that while sound waves can create pressure, their effectiveness in propelling a boat is limited without ideal conditions. Some participants propose using the speaker's electromagnetic coil to pump water instead, which could provide more reliable propulsion. Ultimately, the feasibility of using sound for propulsion remains a complex and experimental topic.
HappyEngineer
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



How do I calculate the propulsive force produced by a speaker?


The Attempt at a Solution



According to the wikipedia page on sound (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound) a jackhammer 1m distant will generate 2 Pa of pressure. A Pascal is 1 N/m^2. So, a speaker that had 1 m^2 of surface area would produce 2 N of force away from the speaker if it produced that sound.

Is that correct? If I attached a speaker like that on the back of a boat, it should produce a continuous 2N of force to push the boat forward.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops. I meant for the subject to be "Can I propel a boat using a speaker?".
 
The above report by wikipedia is only valid for ideal situations i.e. where air resistance,viscosity,friction,wave tension, etc. are absent.
In real life situations ,the above experimental theory can't be realized.
 
A speaker functions by moving a electromagnetic coil back and forth.
I think the pressure you refer to is the wave peak.
For a typical sound wave, the wave valley will be the same amplitude pressure in the opposite direction.
I'm not an expert in acoustics, but I suppose that sound waves which had wave forms that look like a half dome could apply repulsive force. This is because the slow relaxed intake would be drown out by friction, while the quick pule out would overcome friction and push objects away. Sounds like a tricky but fun experiment to do.

However, if you used the same electromagnetic coil to pump water in one direction, with a valve to insure unidirectional flow, you could pump water from the bow to the stern and move your boat.
 
@physixguru, do you mean air resistance on the other side of the boat and friction which keeps the boat in place? If so, couldn't this be addressed by instead putting the speaker on a trolly (with greased axles) on greased train tracks? If the sound has any propulsive effect at all then it's just a matter of cranking the volume up high enough so the force overcomes friction.

@gendou2, I think your objection is perhaps more serious. I'm imagining a simplification of this. Imagine a 0.1Hz wave made by a speaker the size of a sail boat sale. It would puff out in one direction, thus pushing air away and moving the vehicle in the opposite direction. Then the sail (encased in a speaker box) would puff in the opposite direction thus pulling the vehicle back in the opposite direction.

The sound would need to be generated such that the push away was fast and the pull back was slow. If I took normal sound produced by a speaker and somehow doubled the length of time the speaker took to pull back in, what would that do to the sound it produced?

After taking a normal sinusoidal tone at some frequency (let's say 60Hz) and then performing that alteration to the wave (the troughs would be made twice as long as the peaks), what would it sound like? What would happen to a normal song if we made that alteration to the sound waves produced by a song?

If I produced a sound of that sort, is there some way to calculate the amount of propulsive force it produces? The above method would presumably move forward 2 steps for every one step back.
 
How would you create a vacuum my friend?
I could have easily gone into the technical part of it to trouble you like 'gendou2', did but i thought that nothing is more specific than basics.
Wave resistance can't be eliminated until specific devices are used in 'ideal situations'.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top