Can I Safely Construct a Linac Experiment?

NMarkis
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,


I'd like to say hello to all the fellows here at PF, I've been reading threads in the forum for the longest time, and have joined up today.


My inquiry is of the viability of constructing a sort of linac that accelerates ionized[gas], or electrons from an electron gun and ends up hitting (possibly a phosphor coated screen) a block, or though expensive, a Faraday cup. I understand the issues of less-than-ideal vacuum conditions, and especially in the case of the Beta particle, it is a requirement for anything in particular to happen. Getting magnets to work in unison to do any type of accelerating also has it's complexities to work out.

I've read for about a week now on the matters in accelerator physics than hanging around HEP Experiment section of arXiv.org for hours, so my intuition is extremely limited, but I'm eager to overcome this temporal roadblock.


I've seen some posts on here, and I sincerely apologize for any hint of overambitious perspectives or of the sort; I just want others input.

Thanks.


-Nikos
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Basic research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing."
Wernher von BraunMy situation summed up.
 
If you don't know what you are doing, the most likely outcome is injury or death. Please stop.
 
"If you don't know what you are doing, the most likely outcome is injury or death. Please stop."

My second post must have thrown you off:
I have experience with electronics, and playing with NST's, MIG welders, and AC sockets. I work at an airport shop, and use nitrogen bottles regularly, so anything to do with the vacuum is only under 14.7 PSI(compared to 3000 PSI). A polycarbonate tube would suffice for the vacuum cavity and would set any safety concerns-essentially-aside.

The incompetence I hold is the viability of building a small-scale linac under a $2000-$3000 budget.


What are some implications with the idea? How about it as a hypothetical question?
 
If you think a Linac uses magnets to accelerate, you don't know anywhere near enough to do this safely. The fact that you think you do makes you more dangerous, not less.

Thread closed - we do not discuss dangerous activities here.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top