Averagesupernova
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 4,851
- 1,520
I can't possibly see how. Point it out and we'll clear it up.Baluncore said:You are really confusing things here by referring to channels and to stability under load.
But it requires not one, but two amplifiers, (plus a phase splitter), which is “half as cheaper”, so the advantage is cancelled.
A lot of commercially available car audio amps are 2 channel amps for stereo mode with for instance 50 watts per channel at 4 ohms. Suppose a person wants to run an 8 ohmsubwoofer. A 2 channel amp that is not bridgeable cannot run a single 8 ohm coil subwoofer at 100 watts where a bridgeable amp can. To do this would require a dual voice coil subwoofer with 4 ohm coils. So the manufacturers build multi-channel amps that are bridgeable to cover the applications where people want to just run stereo mode to run speakers in the kick panels or doors, or in bridge mode to run a single subwoofer. My '65 Ford has a 4 channel amp for front and rear speakers and a 2 channel running bridged to run a sub. As far as I know, single channel amps in car audio are geared towards running only subwoofers and are class D and are considerably more than a measly 50 watts. So don't bring it up. For that matter, my home theatre powered sub is class D also. It's not limited to car audio.
Last edited: