Can I use one switch for two power sources on my robot?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Megasundato
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sources Switch
AI Thread Summary
Using a single switch to control two power sources for a robot is feasible. The first power source, a 9-volt battery, can have its negative wire connected to the switch, while the second power source for the motors, powered by four C batteries, may also be integrated. A dual-pole single-throw (DPST) switch is recommended to manage both power sources simultaneously. However, some believe that the existing circuitry with transistors may suffice without needing a second switch. Ultimately, the choice depends on the specific design and requirements of the robot's power management system.
Megasundato
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Hello, on my robot I essentially have two sources of power.

#1. The first is my 9-volt battery to the BS2. (+ pin 24, - pin 23)

#2. my second is a power source for the motors. it uses four C batteries not directly connected to the stamp but with it's own system of circuitry. check thumbnail below.

http://www.reconnsworld.com/motorcontrol.gif

Now I plan to use a fairly simple three-pronged switch to turn the entire robot on and off. I believe that I will need to put the switch into the negative wire of the #1 power source ( cathode of 9-volt battery to pin 23). However, what about the second power source? Is there any way that I can tie both into the same switch?

On the other hand, I'm not quite sure if I need a switch for the second source. Perhaps all the transistors will take care of it.

Any thoughts? I'm thinking that last paragraph is correct and that a second switch or a tie-in won't be necessary.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You could use a dual-pole single-throw (DPST) switch to control power for both things using one switch.
 
ok thanks
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top