Can I visualize three variable functions through scalar and vector fields?

AI Thread Summary
Three variable functions cannot be directly plotted, as graphics for one variable functions are two-dimensional lines and those for two variable functions are three-dimensional surfaces. However, scalar and vector fields can serve as visual representations of three variable functions, with scalar fields representing scalar functions and vector fields representing vector functions. While these fields can be visualized in 3D, any representation on a 2D medium will only depict a finite number of points rather than a continuous plot. The use of color dimensions in vector field graphics can enhance the visualization of magnitude within the spatial dimensions. Ultimately, scalar and vector fields provide a practical way to conceptualize three variable functions despite the limitations of direct plotting.
LucasGB
Messages
181
Reaction score
0
Graphics of one variable functions are two dimensional lines. Graphics of two variable functions are three dimensional surfaces. Three variable functions cannot be plotted.

But can I think of the usual 3D representations of vector and scalar fields as manners of visualizing a three variable function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In fact, a scalar field IS a scalar function and likewise a vector field IS a vector function, so a representation of a 3D scalar field is in fact a representation of a 3 variable scalar function.

Any 3D representations of a 3D scalar or vector field on a 2D plane like your computer screen or a sheet of paper cannot be a continuous plot however, only some finite amount of points will be represented like the one in here:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d1/Vector_Field.gif

In the image above, the magnitude of each vector is represented by adding a colour dimension to the 3 spatial dimensions
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top