Can Initial Position Alone Determine an Oscillator's Amplitude and Phase?

  • Thread starter Thread starter insertnamehere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the initial position of an oscillator is sufficient to determine its amplitude and phase constant. It is concluded that knowing only the initial position is inadequate, as additional information such as initial velocity and system parameters like angular frequency, mass, and spring constant are necessary. Without these parameters, one cannot accurately calculate the amplitude and phase constant. The consensus is that more information is essential to solve for these values in oscillatory motion. Therefore, initial position alone cannot determine an oscillator's amplitude and phase.
insertnamehere
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Question about oscillator (Simple Harmonic Motion)

Hi, I just have a basic question about oscillators. If we are only given the initial position, can we still determine the amplitude and phase constant?
I think we can't because we would still need to know the angular frequency (k and m needed as well) and whether or not the system starts with an initial velocity of zero. Am i thinking in the right direction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
no, with just initial position, you can't determine both A and phi.
 


Yes, you are correct. In order to determine the amplitude and phase constant of an oscillator, we need to know the initial position, velocity, and the parameters of the system such as the angular frequency, mass, and spring constant. These parameters affect the behavior of the oscillator and without knowing them, we cannot accurately determine the amplitude and phase constant. So, in order to solve for these values, we need more information than just the initial position.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top