Can integration by parts (and other int related Q's)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of integration techniques, particularly integration by parts, and the treatment of constants in integrals. Participants explore the implications of taking constants out of integrals, the integral of zero, and specific applications in Fourier series. The conversation includes both conceptual questions and technical clarifications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Abe questions whether integration by parts can be used to prove that a constant coefficient can be factored out of an integral, specifically asking about the integral of 2x.
  • EK argues that integration by parts is not applicable in this case as it involves one function with two terms, suggesting that constants can generally be taken out of integrals.
  • A later post reiterates that the integral of zero is a constant, emphasizing that the definition of the integral suffices to understand the treatment of constants.
  • Another participant expresses a desire for deeper conceptual understanding rather than rote application of techniques, indicating a preference for clarity in explaining rules to others.
  • One participant attempts to demonstrate the use of integration by parts with a specific example, showing the relationship between constants and integrals.
  • Discussion shifts to a specific Fourier series problem, with participants evaluating integrals and questioning the treatment of constants and boundaries.
  • Concerns are raised about the periodicity of the function in the Fourier series, leading to clarifications about the values and behavior of the function over its defined intervals.
  • Participants discuss the implications of integrating constant functions and how to handle arbitrary constants in the context of Fourier series.
  • There is a back-and-forth regarding the evaluation of sine functions at specific boundaries, with some participants providing insights into the behavior of even and odd integers in the context of the Fourier series coefficients.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of integration by parts and the treatment of constants in integrals. While some agree on the fundamental principles of integrals, others contest the specifics of their application, particularly in the context of Fourier series. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to these concepts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the treatment of constants and the application of integration techniques. Some participants express uncertainty about the periodicity of functions and the implications for Fourier series, indicating that further clarification may be needed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and educators in calculus and Fourier analysis, particularly those seeking to understand the nuances of integration techniques and their applications in mathematical contexts.

AbedeuS
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Be used to prove that a constant coefficiant can be taken out the integral? such as 2x just being 2 multiplied by the integral of x?

\int{2x} = 2\int{x}

Also, what is the integral of 0? Is it 0 or "c"? I'm mainly asking because I recently got dropped with a Fourier series homework and its difficult knowing when I can take coefficiants out of the integral and when It's wise to keep them inside, such as when you have Cos (x) c to take c out or keep it in.

Thanks for the help
-Abe
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't use integration by parts to prove this, as you don't have 2 functions of x. you have one function of x with two terms. Basically in an integration problem you want to take any constants outside the integral (constant is any function that is not to be evaluated (y etc in this case). In the general case i find it easier to leave numbers in as normally cancellation occurs, as it does in the above case, and is easier to spot in this situation.
But as long as you follow the rules you are taught, its all preference from then on.

EK
 
AbedeuS said:
Be used to prove that a constant coefficiant can be taken out the integral? such as 2x just being 2 multiplied by the integral of x?

\int{2x} = 2\int{x}

Also, what is the integral of 0? Is it 0 or "c"? I'm mainly asking because I recently got dropped with a Fourier series homework and its difficult knowing when I can take coefficiants out of the integral and when It's wise to keep them inside, such as when you have Cos (x) c to take c out or keep it in.

Thanks for the help
-Abe
First, if dF/dx= f(x), then \int f(x)dx= F(x)+ C where C can be any constant. In particular, if f(x)= 0, then \int f(x)dx= C because the derivative of any constant is 0. The derivative of cF(x) is c dF/dx. That's why \int cf(x)dx= c \int f(x)dx. You certainly don't need integration by parts to prove that, just the definition of "integral".

Quite frankly, if you don't already know this (a fundamental of calculus) well, you are going to have serious problems with Fourier series.
 
I can do most integration A ok, I was asking for proofs unlike most math users I work with who will blindly go through the processes like beer drinking phrat boy calculators, and it's not hindering my Fourier series at all.

Just being able to explain the rules to the people who may want to learn it from me will come in handy rather than what I'm told by other students and lecturers alike "oh it just does, don't be silly and ask those questions".

Thanks to erwin, and you ivy, but being frank with someone asking a more conceptual question than a technique one is a bit silly when it comes to the largely underexplained Fourier series (at my level anyway).
 
Okay, let's use integration by parts, then: :smile:
\int{kx}dx, v'=k, u=x
\int{kx}dx=kx^{2}-\int{kx*1}dx\to{2}\int{kx}dx=kx^{2}\to\int{kx}dx=k*\frac{x^{2}}{2}=k*\int{x}dx}
Plus a C of course..

Are you happy now?
 
Yeah sort of, the Fourier series i have in front of me just has little conceptual problems, its:

f(x+8) = f(x)

Values:
2, \ 0 \leq{x}<6
0, \ 6 \leq{x}<8

So the integral for a_{n} is:

a_{n} = \frac{1}{4}\int _{0}^{6} Cos(\frac{\pi nt}4) 2\ dt + \int _{6}^{8} 0\ dt

Evaluated:

a_{n} = \frac{1}{4}\left[\frac{8}{\pi n}Sin(\frac{\pi nt}{4})\right]_{0}^{6}+\left[ c \right]_{6}^{8}

a_{n}=\frac{2}{\pi n} \left[ Sin(\frac{\pi nt}{4}) \right]_{0}^{6} + 2c

And so on to get a final number from there

Is this going along the right lines? or shall I ignore the C in the Fourier series?
 
Last edited:
Your function's values do not match up with the periodicity requirement.

Are you sure the period is 8, rather than 88??
 
Changed it due to latex typo, its 8..
 
Eeh, how do you get 2c?
 
  • #10
8c -6c, although the C's can just be merged into 1 C i guess since its an arbitary coefficiant...
 
  • #11
Completely wrong!
Remember that f(x)\mid_{a}^{b}\equiv{f(b)}-f(a)
Hence, in the particular case f(x)=c, where c is some constant, you have:
f(x)\mid_{a}^{b}={f(b)}-f(a)=c-c=0
 
  • #12
Why are you math mentors so bitter these days ^^.

But I didnt quite look at it like that ^^, could you have a look at the rest of the integral...I have a Fourier homework in front of me so its nice to know if I'm doing the main bits wrong rather then being barked at for pressing 8 too many times or slight substitution problems.

As for the other Fourier series stuff, is it ok to move the integral boundaries in order to make it the integral more "Even" either side, such as:

\int_{0}^{T} goes to \int_{-\frac{1}{2}T}^{\frac{1}{2}T}
 
  • #13
Am I wrong or can you compute the value of 'c' in each case by substituting the boundaries?
 
  • #14
Okay, the rest seems fine, however:
\sin(\frac{\pi{nt}}{4}\mid_{0}^{6}=\sin(\frac{3\pi}{2}{n})
Therefore,
a_{2m}=0
For the odd integers, we have that:
\sin(\frac{3\pi}{2}(4m+1))=-1,\sin(\frac{3\pi}{2}(4m+3))=1, m=0,1...
 
  • #15
Ah thanks a lot arildno :D, so what your saying is that even n's will result in zeroes and odd ones will result in -1, 1, -1, 1 etc etc making the sum in the series cancel out?
 
  • #16
AbedeuS said:
Ah thanks a lot arildno :D, so what your saying is that even n's will result in zeroes and odd ones will result in -1, 1, -1, 1 etc etc making the sum in the series cancel out?

Not at all!

Remember that for the even numbers, the an's will be the product of 0 and some other factors yielding 0, but for the odd integers, we have:
a_{4m+1}=-\frac{2}{\pi(4m+1)},a_{4m+3}=\frac{2}{\pi(4m+3)}, m=0,1...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K