Can Intersecting Events in Probability be Independent?

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
##P(A|A∩B) = \frac{P(A∩(A∩B))}{P(A∩B)} = \frac{P(A∩B)}{P(A∩B)} = 1##
So given the the event "A and B" as the sample space, the probability of A occurring is 1.

##P(A|A∪B) = \frac{P(A∩(A∪B))}{P(A∪B)} = \frac{P(A)}{P(A∪B)}##
Those two events are independent if and only if the probability of "A or B" occurring is 1, in which case the conditional probability of A equals the probability of A.

Is my reasoning correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you mean that A and A∪B are independent if P(A∪B)=1 ? yes, this is a special case of independent events. There is one other special case which can mean that A and A∪B are independent. You are trying to make the last equation go from
P(A|A∪B) = \frac{P(A)}{P(A∪B)}
to become:
P(A|A∪B) = P(A)
right? and you did this by setting P(A∪B)=1. But there is another way also.
 
MohammedRady97 said:
##P(A|A∩B) = \frac{P(A∩(A∩B))}{P(A∩B)} = \frac{P(A∩B)}{P(A∩B)} = 1##
So given the the event "A and B" as the sample space, the probability of A occurring is 1.
We'd have to consider the case B \cap A = \emptyset

##P(A|A∪B) = \frac{P(A∩(A∪B))}{P(A∪B)} = \frac{P(A)}{P(A∪B)}##
Those two events are independent
Which two events? A and A \cup B ?

if and only if the probability of "A or B" occurring is 1

Suppose B = \emptyset.

I think your results are interesting and worth perfecting by taking care of the exceptional cases.
 
Stephen Tashi said:
We'd have to consider the case B \cap A = \emptysetWhich two events? A and A \cup B ?
Suppose B = \emptyset.

I think your results are interesting and worth perfecting by taking care of the exceptional cases.

What about ##P(A|B)##? My gut tells me that since A and B intersect, A and B must be dependent. This is wrong, of course, but how do I prove the dependence (or independence) of two intersecting events?
 
MohammedRady97 said:
What about ##P(A|B)##?

I don't know what your are asking.

My gut tells me that since A and B intersect, A and B must be dependent. This is wrong, of course, but how do I prove the dependence (or independence) of two intersecting events?

You can't prove the dependence or independence of two events that have a non-empty intersection just from knowing the intersection is non-empty. It's a quantitative question that depends on the numerical values of the probabilities involved. If you want to prove a result, you'll have to add more assumptions - something beyond just knowing that the intersection is non-empty.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Back
Top