Can Kinematics Equations Be Used for an Entire Projectile Trajectory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bengo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
Kinematics equations can be applied to the entire trajectory of a projectile, not just half of it. When calculating the final velocity after a complete flight, the equations yield the same final speed as when only considering the ascent to the apex. It's crucial to account for the direction of acceleration and displacement, particularly after reaching the apex, as the trajectory is symmetric. Users confirm that basic kinematics equations are effective for analyzing projectile motion, provided the correct signs are used. Understanding these principles is essential for success on exams like the MCAT.
Bengo
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I feel like I'm missing a large concept of the kinematics equation. Up until today, I have only used them for HALF of a trajectory (initial velocity and final velocity of 0 at the apex). But can you use them for an ENTIRE trajectory? So say something is fired from the ground and lands on the ground at the same level. If you plug in the initial velocity and use the entire flight time, will you get the same final velocity from these equations?? I'm so confused. Please help me get this sorted out before I take the MCAT.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bengo said:
If you plug in the initial velocity and use the entire flight time, will you get the same final velocity from these equations??
Sure. Why not give it a shot? (The same speed, at least.)
 
Which kinematics equations are you using?
(most of the basic kinematics equations you get will work fine for a trajectory however long you want though)
 
Try it. What happens if you apply this equation to say a bullet fired straight up?

V2=U2+2as

Remember that if up is +ve then a is -ve.

What happens to s after the apex?
 
genericusrnme, I was just talking about those formulas for a projectile motion from a physics 1 class.

But I see that it works now, the trajectory is symmetric so I guess I just have to be careful about the signs?

Thank you!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top