Can L be conserved if its magnitude is conserved?

subzero0137
Messages
91
Reaction score
4
Problem: Consider a system for which Newton's second law is $$ \frac {d \vec v}{dt} = - [ \frac {h(r)h'(r)}{r} + \frac {k}{r^3} ] \vec r- \frac {h'(r)}{r} \vec L $$ where k is a constant, h(r) is some function of r, h'(r) is its derivative and L = r x v is the angular momentum. Show that $$ \frac {d \vec L}{dt} = - \frac {h'(r)}{r} \vec r × \vec L$$ and use this equation to prove that L is not generally conserved, but its magnitude L is conserved.

Attempt: I've done the first part of the question, but I don't know how I should go about showing that L is not conserved but its magnitude is conserved. Any hints would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
subzero0137 said:
Problem: Consider a system for which Newton's second law is $$ \frac {d \vec v}{dt} = - [ \frac {h(r)h'(r)}{r} + \frac {k}{r^3} ] \vec r- \frac {h'(r)}{r} \vec L $$ where k is a constant, h(r) is some function of r, h'(r) is its derivative and L = r x v is the angular momentum. Show that $$ \frac {d \vec L}{dt} = - \frac {h'(r)}{r} \vec r × \vec L$$ and use this equation to prove that L is not generally conserved, but its magnitude L is conserved.

Attempt: I've done the first part of the question, but I don't know how I should go about showing that L is not conserved but its magnitude is conserved. Any hints would be appreciated.

The magnitude squared is given by the dot product of L with itself. Can you show the time derivative of that is 0?
 
So |L|^2 = (r×v)⋅(r×v) = (rr)(vv) - (vr)(vr) = |r|^2 |v|^2 right? But how would I show the time derivative of this to be 0? \frac {dL}{dt} = r \frac {dv}{dt} + v \frac {dr}{dt}, but how do I make this equal 0?
 
subzero0137 said:
So |L|^2 = (r×v)⋅(r×v) = (rr)(vv) - (vr)(vr) = |r|^2 |v|^2 right? But how would I show the time derivative of this to be 0? \frac {dL}{dt} = r \frac {dv}{dt} + v \frac {dr}{dt}, but how do I make this equal 0?

You want to show the time derivative of ##L \cdot L## is zero. Use the product rule and your given expression for dL/dt. Can you tell me why dL/dt must be perpendicular to L?
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top