I Can LIGO Detect Gravity Waves from Directly Above or Below?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bern1937
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Ligo
AI Thread Summary
LIGO detects gravitational waves by measuring changes in the length of its two arms as a wave passes, affecting the time of flight of light beams. The sensitivity of LIGO is highest for waves coming directly above or below, with polarization aligned parallel to its arms, as this causes one arm to stretch while the other squishes. Waves arriving at a 45° angle to the arms do not induce any measurable change, rendering LIGO blind to them. The design of LIGO includes multiple detectors in different orientations to improve detection capabilities. Understanding the polarization and directionality of gravitational waves is crucial for effective detection.
Bern1937
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
LIGO operation, for gravity waves
As I understand, the gravity wave detection system is possible due to the change in length of the two arms, as a wave passes, thus changing the distance the light beams travel. As this distance changes, the time of flight will change in relationship to each other. This difference is then measured, after combining, and monitored, for the changing phase angle, caused by a passing gravity wave.

My question: If the source of the wave is located directly above or below LIGO, will the gravity wave be detected?

Thank You,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Point of language: LIGO detects gravitational waves. Gravity waves are a type of surface wave on water.

The directional sensitivity of a LIGO detector is quite complex. The "stretch and squish" effect is perpendicular to the direction of travel of the waves. So a single LIGO instrument is actually most sensitive to waves coming from directly above or below with polarisation parallel to its arms, since one arm is stretched and the other one is squished. It is blind to waves coming in the same direction with polarisation at 45° to its arms because they don't stretch either arm. It is less sensitive to waves coming in at other angles even if the polarisation is optimal. The velocity of the source also matters since this can make some component of the stretch and squish parallel to the detector's timelike direction, to which it is also blind.

All of this is why it started with two detectors in different orientations, and why they have added and plan to add more.
 
Last edited:
There's a nice diagram at Wikipedia showing how a ring of free floating masses react to a gravitational wave passing through perpendicular to the plane of the image. You can see the stretch-and-squish in action.

LIGO doesn't have a ring of free floating masses. It has just the topmost and rightmost dots and another one in the centre, which would be unmoving. If you ignore everything except those two dots and the middle of the ring, you can see that one arm lengthens as the other shortens. But that's if the wave is polarised conveniently. If the wave happens to come in polarised so that LIGO is at 45° (so its arms point north east and south east on the diagram) then you can see that those dots don't move at all.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
118
Views
9K
Replies
27
Views
3K
Back
Top