Can Magnetic Flux Induce EMF in Transformer Without Shearing Winding Conductors?

AI Thread Summary
A changing magnetic flux can induce an electromotive force (EMF) in a transformer's secondary winding without physically cutting through the conductors, as long as the flux varies over time within the area of the winding loop. This phenomenon is explained by Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, which states that a time-varying magnetic field induces voltage. The magnetic flux is confined to an ideal magnetic core, eliminating leakage, and the induced EMF is out of phase with the applied voltage. Understanding this concept may require familiarity with advanced mathematical principles like Green's theorem and Stokes' theorem. The physics behind statically induced EMFs hinges on the relationship between changing magnetic fields and the resulting induced voltages in surrounding coils.
b.shahvir
Messages
284
Reaction score
25
Hi, :smile:

I would like to understand something pertaining to transformer action.

How does a changing magnetic flux, assumed to be bound by an 'ideal' magnetic core (with zero leakage flux), induce an EMF in the secondary winding of a transformer...without the flux ever shearing or cutting the winding conductors? Can someone please explain the actual physics behind statically induced EMFs and currents under these conditions?
Thanx.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The applied voltage (EMF) induces a flux in the iron, with a reactive magnetizing current (dI/dt = V/L, where L = the inductance), leading the applied voltage by 90 degrees. The flux change in the iron in turn induces a voltage (EMF) in the secondary winding (Faraday's law), again shifted by 90 degrees, so it is 180 degrees out of phase (remember the minus sign in Faraday's Law) with the applied voltage. If you connect a resistance to the secondary, the resistor current is in phase with both the input and output voltages.
 
Bob S said:
The applied voltage (EMF) induces a flux in the iron, with a reactive magnetizing current (dI/dt = V/L, where L = the inductance), leading the applied voltage by 90 degrees. The flux change in the iron in turn induces a voltage (EMF) in the secondary winding (Faraday's law), again shifted by 90 degrees, so it is 180 degrees out of phase (remember the minus sign in Faraday's Law) with the applied voltage. If you connect a resistance to the secondary, the resistor current is in phase with both the input and output voltages.

Dear Bob, :smile:

I'm aware of Faraday's laws of Electromagnetic Induction and transformer action in general. However, my interest is basically to understand how a magnetic flux confined to a magnetic circuit be able to induce an EMF in a coil surrounding the magnetic core. Flux leakage is considered to be zero so that there is no cutting of secondary winding conductors...basically I need to understand the physics behind statically induced EMFs.
Thanx
 
b.shahvir said:
Dear Bob, :smile:

I'm aware of Faraday's laws of Electromagnetic Induction and transformer action in general. However, my interest is basically to understand how a magnetic flux confined to a magnetic circuit be able to induce an EMF in a coil surrounding the magnetic core. Flux leakage is considered to be zero so that there is no cutting of secondary winding conductors...basically I need to understand the physics behind statically induced EMFs.
Thanx

There is no requirement for the flux to physically pass through the wire, just that there is a time varying flux passing through the area of the loop made by the wire.

It's a strange concept...

Try looking at Green's theorem (leading onto stokes theorem). To accept that green's theorem is correct requires the same leap of faith you need to accept that flux through a loop can induce a voltage in the loop. I would recommend typing 'green's theorem MIT' into youtube and watching the lecture by Prof. Auroux.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top