Can Magnets Really Prevent Car Crashes? Debunking the Myth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spikeywan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Magnets
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility and implications of using magnets to prevent car crashes, exploring both theoretical and practical aspects. Participants examine the concept's validity, potential effects on vehicle dynamics, and alternative ideas related to magnet use in vehicles.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that the concept of using magnets to prevent collisions is fundamentally flawed due to the scaling of magnetic fields in real-world scenarios.
  • Others propose that while magnets might prevent direct contact, the resulting forces could still cause significant damage to passengers, similar to an actual collision.
  • One participant suggests that a gradual deceleration caused by magnetic repulsion could reduce injury, comparing it to the function of crumple zones in cars.
  • Another idea presented involves using magnets to create hovercraft-like vehicles, which could reduce friction and reliance on fossil fuels, though it would require powerful magnets and a constant electric field.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for chain reactions in multi-car accidents if magnets were to repel vehicles forward.
  • Some participants humorously discuss the impracticality of using implanted magnets in humans to enforce safe driving behaviors.
  • There is a mention of the importance of minimizing speed during a collision to reduce damage, emphasizing the role of deceleration in injury prevention.
  • One participant highlights that air resistance plays a significant role in stopping a vehicle, which could affect the feasibility of hovercraft designs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the effectiveness and practicality of using magnets to prevent car crashes. There is no consensus on whether the proposed magnetic solutions would be beneficial or effective in real-world scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions, such as the strength of magnets required and the dynamics of vehicle interactions during collisions. The discussion includes unresolved technical details regarding the implementation of magnetic systems in vehicles.

  • #61
ElCuabnito said:
What if we lay out a thin layering of magnets around the bottom portion of the car, said layer would have a positive charge. And the we could modify the magnets by connecting them to the cars power so that the strength of the magnetic would be directly affected by the speed and power exerted by the car. We could also attach small sensors on separate areas of the magnetic layering so that if scrap metal does get attached to a section, then the power to that area would go to 0 and the scrap metal would fall off.

Oh! I didn't know we had two magnets on car bumper threads.

I missed this one.

But I like your idea of collecting scrap metal with cars. Only I'd turn the magnets off when I got home. Scrap metal is valuable.

The linked thread above contains the calculations I performed on magnetic car bumpers.

And I did solve one of the problems mentioned in both threads with a Halbach array.

Though I still don't think they will prevent car crashes, I have come up with a different use for magnets in bumpers:

Tailgaters. When people insist on tailgating, they are psychologically pushing the car in front of them. Why not let them really do it, safely, with magnets! I'd be getting about 500 mpg if we could get these installed on everyones cars. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Obviosly the producers of Top-gear have no previous education in classical physics.


I never saw the episode but, there is no magnet that would offset the potentially huge amount of POTENTIAL ENERGY stored up in the mass x acceleration of the vehicle to offset any magnetic repulsion.

Now, if there was a large NEO magnet underneath the vehicle, that was suspended 1/4 inch off the ground, and the vehicle was at a constant rate of acceleration, then the car would slow down substantially if it were to transition from blacktop to a solid billet of aluminum it was moving over.

In Washington state, Department of Transportation do have trucks that have massive retractable crash boxes that do crumple in the event a car were to hit it. These are there to protect the workers.

BTW does anyone here have a good source of Rare Earth Neo magnets of different sizes that is very competitive in price?
 
  • #63
Spikeywan said:
No question, I just wanted to share a thought...

I saw a very old episode of Top Gear last night, where he put magnets onto the front of two model cars, and drove them at each other. Because the magnets were orientated so that they would repel, the cars couldn't crash.

This was given as a way of preventing accidents. :rolleyes:

However, if this was done with real cars, although the cars wouldn't touch each other, they would sustain just as much damage as if they had hit.
It would be pretty hard to drive east or west with 500kg neodymium magnets in the front :eek:

Instead, use a 1 meter thick block of EPP foam :approve:

Vidar
 
  • #64
My initial thought was... wouldn't giant magnets like that mess with cell phones and heart monitors anyway?
 
  • #65
Low-Q said:
It would be pretty hard to drive east or west with 500kg neodymium magnets in the front :eek:

Instead, use a 1 meter thick block of EPP foam :approve:

Vidar

500 kg!

By my calculations, from my $800 6" diameter x 2" thick magnet, that would cost roughly $400,000!

Calculations on how to fit all those magnets(500!) on a vehicle not attempted.

56.5 cubic inches for a 6" x 2" magnet
7.00 specific gravity of neodymium
0.0164 weight of 1 cubic inch of water in kg
6.49 kg of $800 magnet
500 kg of magnets on Vidars car
506 magnets
$405,189 never mind
 
  • #66
Did anyone consider the extra MASS that would be involved for a strong enough magnet?
If this idea was on TV it must have been April 1st, I think.
 
  • #67
Permanent magnets won't do. But, how about an electromagnet that turns on when a crash is occurring? But, it would require a pulsed energy supply with an energy comparable to a car crash, over a few milliseconds. Then some dude decides to hack the energy systems into a railgun power source...
 
  • #68
Khashishi said:
Permanent magnets won't do. But, how about an electromagnet that turns on when a crash is occurring? But, it would require a pulsed energy supply with an energy comparable to a car crash, over a few milliseconds. Then some dude decides to hack the energy systems into a railgun power source...

No, the entire idea of using magnets to make an accident safer is completely bogus. Other than the fact that it isn't going to work, for the cost, weight, and complexity of such a system you could simply add passive features that would actually save lives.
 
  • #69
I know. I was just playing around with the idea of having railgun power sources on every car.
 
  • #70
Stop behaving like small kids you don't have a very simple idea
you all mean that if we place a net of magnet over the cars then due to the force of repulsion the cars will not collide but on the same hand the another pole exposed to the another side will attract the different pole and that could be a cause for the accident but my sweet companions if you place two magnets in such a way that their same pole (south pole) will face to every internal face and due to this all the cars will only have the north pole exposed to the outer and that will only prevent accident not it'll going to cause it :-)
 
  • #71
Arpiet said:
Stop behaving like small kids you don't have a very simple idea
you all mean that if we place a net of magnet over the cars then due to the force of repulsion the cars will not collide but on the same hand the another pole exposed to the another side will attract the different pole and that could be a cause for the accident but my sweet companions if you place two magnets in such a way that their same pole (south pole) will face to every internal face and due to this all the cars will only have the north pole exposed to the outer and that will only prevent accident not it'll going to cause it :-)

I highly advise you to re-read the thread. It has already been explained that this concept is fundamentally flawed and will not work.
 
  • #72
Hi Arpiet, welcome to PF!
Arpiet said:
if you place two magnets in such a way that their same pole (south pole) will face to every internal face and due to this all the cars will only have the north pole exposed to the outer
No, this arrangement would be a magnetic multipole, not a monopole. Other similar magnetic multipoles would be drawn to the joint between the two south poles. It would cause collisions if strong enough, and it would make them into side impact collisions where there is less of a crumple zone available.
 
Last edited:
  • #73
DaleSpam said:
Hi Arpiet, welcome to PF!No, this arrangement would be a magnetic multipole, not a monopole. Other similar magnetic multipoles would be drawn to the joint between the two south poles. It would cause collisions if strong enough, and it would make them into side impact collisions where there is less of a crumple zone available.

This is why we need to spend billions of dollars on research so we can find magnetic monopoles. We would then just super-glue quadrillions of them to the exteriors of our vehicles.

While we're waiting, why don't we just negatively charge all the cars, with some unknown number of coulombs of electrons.

Hmmm... That won't work. When the cars approach each other, the electrons will simply race to the opposite ends. Ah ha! But that's only with metal cars. If we make them out of some type of insulating material, it might work. Or electrically charged paint!

hmmm...

wiki on the coulomb said:
In everyday terms
...
According to Coulomb's law, two negative point charges of 1 C, placed one meter apart, would experience a repulsive force of 9×109 N, a force roughly equal to the weight of 920000 metric tons of mass on the surface of the Earth.

Well that sounds like plenty of force. But obviously, cars aren't point sources. I suppose we could model cars as spheres, just to make the math simpler.

skreeeeetch!

This isn't going to work at all. Half of the population is not going to get into these cars after they spent all that money on perms.

l.jpg

Never mind...

ps. People just need to learn how to drive, properly...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
12K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K