Can multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) slide telescopically?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for straight multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) to slide telescopically. The initial inquiry suggests that quantum interactions may hinder axial motion, despite graphite's lubricating properties. Participants note that the ability to slide would depend on the radius difference between the tubes and their length, with some suggesting that dual-walled nanotubes may not allow for telescopic movement. The conversation also touches on the concept of superlubricity, where reduced friction between the tubes could theoretically facilitate sliding, although the mechanics of this phenomenon remain unclear. References to literature on "telescopic pull-out" and specific studies are provided to support the discussion. Overall, the feasibility of telescopic motion in MWCNTs is questioned, with emphasis on the interactions between carbon atoms in concentric structures.
taylaron
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
1
Greetings,

I'm trying to find out whether or not straight multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) have the ability to slide telescopically. Although I have no formal education on the subject, my suspicion is that quantum interactions will inhibit axial motion, but I'm intrigued as graphite makes a great lubricant.

This situation presumes an ideal or perfect carbon nanotube. See the image below for reference

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...SSCg&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=40&ved=1t:429,r:3,s:0"

Thank you for your time,

-Taylaron
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well I suppose it would depend on the exact difference in radius wouldn't it?
 
For a standard dual-walled nanotube, I suspect the answer is 'no', but I'm no expert. It would also depend on the length of the tube, as the C-C bonding strength between the two would increase with length. Now if you could start with two SWNT's, with the inner one being slighly smaller in diameter than the example above, I'd say it should work. But, I have not read about anyone trying this. The below link is a company using CNT's for water purification:

http://www.poriferanano.com/
 
Yes, that is one of their modes of failure (and probably the more likely one). You can do a quick literature search on "Telescopic pull-out" or "sword-in sheath" to find some papers.

Here is one example: http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~biy/Selected%20papers/00JPC_CNTslide.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't understand how 2 single-wall CNTs grown non-concentrically can be placed concentric with one another and are able to slide telescopically while the tubes in grown double-walled CNTs cannot slide telescopically.

I was under the impression the two (ideal) tubes on a double-wall CNT were not bound together. I thought that the carbon atoms in CNTs did not have an excess electron after growth. Are the adjacent carbon atoms between concentric CNTs exerting force on one another (from one tube to another)?

I'm not familiar with the strong or weak nuclear force and its implications in this situation.

Thanks,
-Taylaron
 
Thanks day, that is a really helpful article.

The author mentioned Superlubricity between tubes in multi-walled CNTs. I don't understand how superlubricity works in this context .

-Taylaron
 
Last edited:
Hello! I've been brainstorming on how to prevent a lot of ferrofluid droplets that are in the same container. This is for an art idea that I have (I absolutely love it when science and art come together) where I want it to look like a murmuration of starlings. Here's a link of what they look like: How could I make this happen? The only way I can think of to achieve the desired effect is to have varying droplet sizes of ferrofluid suspended in a clear viscous liquid. Im hoping for the...
Hello everyone! I am curious to learn how laboratories handle in-house chip manufacturing using soft lithography for microfluidics research. In the lab where I worked, only the mask for lithography was made by an external company, whereas the mold and chip fabrication were carried out by us. The process of making PDMS chips required around 30 min–1 h of manual work between prepolymer casting, punching/cutting, and plasma bonding. However, the total time required to make them was around 4...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top