Can Newton's Gravitational Law and Hooke's Law be Unified?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the potential unification of Newton's Gravitational Law and Hooke's Law through mathematical equations, questioning whether gravitational forces can be reconciled with elastic forces. It highlights that while Hooke's Law describes forces increasing with extension, gravitational force behaves oppositely, complicating any direct comparison. The participants debate the validity of equations linking gravitational and spring constants, emphasizing that gravitational systems are not universally applicable due to varying mass and distance. Additionally, the concept of non-relativistic gravitational systems is defined, noting that traditional Newtonian principles break down at relativistic speeds. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that Newton's Law does not conform to Hooke's Law due to fundamental differences in their force behaviors.
Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3


Hooke's Law:
F_h (x) = -kx
k - spring force constant

Newtons Law: (Gravitation)
F_g (r) = -G \frac{M^2}{r^2}

F_g (r) = F_h (r)

Newton-Hooke Equasion:
-G \frac{M^2}{r^2} = -kr

k = G \frac{M^2}{r^3}

G = k \frac{r^3}{M^2}

Does Newtons Law obey Hooke's Law?

[/color]
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
"i.e. Do two stars of equal mass eventually rebound after being pulled apart?"

Explain what you mean by "rebound", and by what mechanism do you mean "pulled apart"?
 
Originally posted by Labguy
"i.e. Do two stars of equal mass eventually rebound after being pulled apart?"

Explain what you mean by "rebound", and by what mechanism do you mean "pulled apart"?
Please...
 
Energy...



U_g = U_h

- G \frac{M^2}{r} = - k \frac{r^2}{2}

k = G \frac{2 M^2}{r^3}

G = k \frac{r^3}{2 M^2}

E = K + U

E_g = E_h

Newton-Hooke Energy Theorem:
E_g = \frac{Mv^2}{2} - G \frac{M^2}{r} = \frac{Mv^2}{2} - k \frac{r^2}{2}

E_g = m \left( \frac{v^2}{2} - G \frac{M}{r} \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left( mv^2 - kr^2 \right)

E_g = m \left( 2 \left( \frac{ \pi r}{T} \right)^2 - G \frac{M}{r} \right) = \frac{r^2}{2} \left( m \left( \frac{2 \pi}{T} \right)^2 - k \right)

E_h = \frac{r^2}{2} \left( m \left( \frac{2 \pi}{T} \right)^2 - k \right)

k = 2 \left( 2m \left( \frac{ \pi}{T} \right)^2 - \frac{E_h}{r^2} \right)

Does Newtons Law obey Hooke's Law?

Are the above theorems true for all non-relativistic gravitational systems?

What is the value for Hooke's Constant (k)?

 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks. I just didn't understand the previous point since it was all formulae with no verbiage.
 
The answer would be no. As can be seen from the equations, Hooke's law, which applies to elastic stretching and squeezing, increases in force with extension, whilst gravitational force does the opposite. Thus, while an object in a gravitational field has an escape velocity, you can't escape a spring.

G = k \frac{r^3}{M^2}
This, as you can see, is nonsense, as G is a constant whilst M and r vary from situation to situation.

Your equation only represents a system where a gravitationally attracted body is kept from falling in by a gigantic spring of natural length 2r.
 
Welcome after to me. What are non-relativistic gravitatioanl systems

[?]
 
Hooke's Law...


is nonsense, as G is a constant whilst M and r vary from situation to situation.

increases in force with extension
[/color]

G = k \frac{r^3}{M^2}
What are the Standard International units for G as described by this formula as opposed to Newton's G SI units?

Newton's G Law increases in force with contraction.

Does Hooke's Law increase in force with contraction, or decrease?

Why is it presumed that Hooke's Constant (k) is a universal constant described by this formula as opposed to a static constant applied to a given system?

What are the values of Hooke's Constant(k) for a Mercury-Sol system as opposed to a Jupiter-Sol system?


Q: What are non-relativistic gravitatioanl systems?
[/color]

A non-relativistic gravitational system is a gravity dominated system in which the mass velocities involved are only a small fraction of luminous velocity.

v_m \ll c

All Newtonian Theorems fail at relativistic velocities.

 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
39
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
347
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top