Can No Movement FTL Travel Revolutionize Space Travel?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a device that could increase the distance between two objects, potentially allowing for faster-than-light travel by manipulating spacetime. The idea suggests that if distance can be expanded without a maximum rate, it could enable translocation of mass by effectively shrinking the distance between objects in a straight line. Participants reference general relativity and the Alcubierre warp drive as theoretical frameworks supporting this notion. There is debate about the feasibility and efficiency of such a device, with some skepticism about its practical implementation. Overall, the conversation explores the implications of creating spacetime and its potential to revolutionize space travel.
AP
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was thinking a while back, after reading something about inflation. if you could build a device that will increse the distance between you and an object(lets say earth), you would be able the change posision faster then sublightspeed motion allows. because you would create distance, of which there is no maximum rate of expansion, between two object, you would be able to shrink the distance between any object if that object were in a stait line between the two things that you were increseing the distance between.

if you follow me, that would be a way to translocate anyamount of mass. but you would first have to have that way to create distance between two specific objects.

I would like your thoughts on this matter.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Read the posting guidelines. What part of 'personal theories' do you not understand? If you are serious, show the math.
 
Last edited:
I think he/she is talking about the fact that general relativity allows the space between two objects to expand faster than the speed of light, in some "reasonable" coordinate system (though nothing ever exceeds the speed of light locally of course). Something like this is the idea behind the Alcubierre warp drive.
 
With respect to Chronos' objection, I'll assume AP is proposing to build a device that is consistent with workings of the mainstream models of the universe (since AP mentioned inflation theory and some principles of relativity theory). But yeah, if AP is proposing a device that works assuming a model other than relativity/etc. is in play, then we'll end the speculation here.

AP said:
if you could build a device that will increse the distance between you and an object(lets say earth),

Meaning a device that creates spacetime, right?

you would be able the change posision faster then sublightspeed motion allows.

I suppose it would depend on the efficiency of the device, assuming such a thing can be built at all.

because you would create distance, of which there is no maximum rate of expansion, between two object, you would be able to shrink the distance between any object if that object were in a stait line between the two things that you were increseing the distance between.

if you follow me, that would be a way to translocate anyamount of mass.

Wouldn't you just push both objects away?

initial condition:
Device - Earth - Object

creating new space:
Device ---- Earth - Object
(no change between the Earth & the Object)
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Back
Top