Can Non-Newtonian Fluids Predict Pole (De)acceleration in Oobleck?

AI Thread Summary
Modeling the (de)acceleration of a pole dropped into a non-Newtonian fluid like oobleck is feasible, given that the viscosity is known as a function of shear stress. The impact velocity, along with the known dimensions and properties of the fluid, can be used to analyze the interaction. However, the complexity of the problem suggests that an analytical solution may not be achievable. Instead, computational methods are likely necessary to accurately predict the pole's behavior in the fluid. This approach highlights the challenges of working with non-Newtonian fluids in dynamic scenarios.
eisenstein
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem.

I drop a pole (say length L, mass M, radius R) on a non-Newtonian fluid (corn starch and water) with impact velocity v. The density and viscosity of the oobleck is known, and I know the dimensions of the oobleck container (a square box of length S filled up to height H, so the volume is H*S*S). I want to model the (de)acceleration of the pole as a function of v. Is this possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The viscosity is known as a function of shear stress? If so, it's possible, but it is a pretty complicated problem, and I doubt an analytical solution is available (computational methods would be required).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top